http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7122
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-11 14:46 ------- > Rafael, > is it possible to reproduce this failure without a suspend/resume > cycle involved? That may complicate this issue, and it is best > if we can remove any complications. Yes, it is. I'll do that tomorrow. > Unfortunately this doesn't mean that _ON failed > (_ON doesn't return any status) > it means that acpi_evaluate_object() failed. > Please dump out the bad status value. I will. > Also, please attach the output from acpidump -- I'd like to see > if there any anything special happening in the _ON and _OFF methods. Will go in the next comment. > re: the logic changes in your patch. > There are all kinds of errors in the dmesg -- it isn't clear > where things first go bad. I'd like to see a dmesg showing the failure > with the additional debug output, but no changes in logic > or error handling from the original kernel. I'll do my best. :-) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
