http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
------- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-08 20:37 ------- (In reply to comment #29) > IMO, patch in comment #22 #23 and #28 are ready for in 2.6.26. :) > > For the patch in comment #25, we don't need this patch if the patch > 03-force-offline-cpu is applied because we don't need this sysfs link to poke > the "online" attribute under cpu sysdev node before poking the "eject" file. > Alok, what do you think? > Hi Zhang, IMO it would useful when we are re-adding the cpu to the system. In that case we can have scripts in userspace to bring the cpu online as soon as that cpu is added to the system. Now we can have a similar feature in kernel which implicitly brings the cpu online as soon as its added, but then I think we loose the flexibility for the user to decide if he wants the cpu online as soon as its added to the system. So IMHO lets keep that patch, unless anybody disagrees. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
