http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
------- Comment #31 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-09 19:13 ------- I'm concerned that if the access to the eject file completes before the actual eject, that it may be possible for user-space to get confused. While this may be a little academic, it sounds like the kind of thing where there will be a race. Simpler for the user if the eject is guaranteed to be complete when the access to the file returns. So instead of deferring the actual eject so the return can complete, how about if we execute the eject and defer removing the file until the user access is complete? That way when we return to the user, we are guaranteed that the eject is done. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
