http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658
------- Comment #79 from martin-kernel-bugzi...@earth.li 2009-02-27 09:57 ------- I wonder if it would make sense to split up the functionality in Matthew's patch into two parts. Rather than a single sysfs entry at /sys/class/thermal/xxx/passive, used to both add a forced passive trip point and force polling for it, have two: /sys/class/thermal/xxx/force_passive_temp (temperature at which to force passive, default to actual passive trip if defined, or 5 degrees below critical) /sys/class/thermal/xxx/force_passive_poll (interval at which to poll for tripping this temperature, default to 0) Then for machines that behave like this one, the additional trip point alone would be sufficient, and for any that actually need polling, that can be set separately. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
