https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31762
--- Comment #8 from brady...@gmail.com 2011-03-24 02:02:24 --- Thanks for looking into this. Would you be able to tell me what I should report to DFI to see if they want to fix the bug? On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:01 PM, <bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org>wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31762 > > > > > > --- Comment #7 from Lin Ming <ming.m....@intel.com> 2011-03-24 01:01:03 > --- > [ 0.841107] ACPI Warning: For \_TZ_.THRM._PSL: Return Package type > mismatch > at index 0 - found [NULL Object Descriptor], expected Reference > (20110112/nspredef-1059) > [ 0.841114] ACPI: Expecting a [Reference] package element, found type 0 > > > Name (_PSL, Package (0x01) > { > \_PR.CPU0 > }) > > This is a BIOS bug, there is no \_PR.CPU0 defined in any of ACPI tables. > > > This a bug that was fixed in the kernel-2.6.34.8-68.fc13 under Red Hat > Bugzilla > > No, that was different, it has \_PR.CPU0 defined, just type mismatch. > > -- > Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug. > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
