https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31762
--- Comment #9 from Lin Ming <ming.m....@intel.com> 2011-03-24 02:23:33 --- Created an attachment (id=51852) --> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=51852) override buggy DSDT You can forward this report to DFI. Just found that the BIOS actually has processor defined, but with different name \_PR.C000 instead of \_PR.CPU0 Scope (\_PR) { Processor (\_PR.C000, 0x00, 0x00004010, 0x06) {} Processor (\_PR.C001, 0x01, 0x00004010, 0x06) {} Processor (\_PR.C002, 0x02, 0x00004010, 0x06) {} Processor (\_PR.C003, 0x03, 0x00004010, 0x06) {} } Could you try to override the buggy DSDT? See how to do this at http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/overridingDSDT.php I have attached the DSDT.hex, so you only need to start from step 5. "5. Put it where the kernel build can include it: " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
