https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44161
--- Comment #140 from Juan Manuel Cabo <juanmanuel.c...@gmail.com> --- No, adding a check to see if the data is the same as before can be tricky. The best is to add a usleep() or sleep() call, to give time to the EC. Because sometimes the same event _is_ actually queued many times. Try a call to sleep(1) inside the loop, and you'll see better. Anyways, the kernel patch in comment #133 doesn't avoids all this because it uses the actual ec.c functions to query the EC properly (as opposed to my little program which uses a more direct (ahem quick and dirty :-) ) approach). -- Juan Manuel Cabo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
