No problems!  I will never be the first to cast the stones - living in a
glass house tends to educate one!

And, this is all a learning process.  For the first time in probably 4
years, I had to create a trust to a Windows NT domain from our Windows
2000.  Guess what?  I got an education in the fact that LMHOSTS *DOES*
still matter! :-)

Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
  Microsoft Certified Trainer
  MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
  
"Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic."
  ---  Arthur C. Clarke



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al 
> Lilianstrom
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] 2 AD DCs but only one accepting 
> authentication
> 
> 
> I stand corrected. We've been in native mode from day 1 so I 
> tend to forget that some of the things we can't work without 
> don't apply to mixed mode.
> 
>       al
> 
> Rick Kingslan wrote:
> > 
> > Note the bottom paragraph of the Q article -
> > 
> > "In a Mixed-mode domain, universal groups cannot be created. If a 
> > Windows 2000-based computer is located in a down-level or 
> Mixed-mode 
> > domain, different behavior occurs. Other domains may be in 
> Native mode 
> > and universal groups may have been created that contain the 
> user as a 
> > member. The domain controller authenticating the logon request will 
> > add the SIDs of the global groups of which the user is a 
> member to the 
> > user's token and the local computer adds SIDs for groups of 
> which the 
> > user is a member on the local computer as appropriate. When 
> an attempt 
> > to use resources in another domain occurs, the computer hosting the 
> > resource contacts a domain controller for that domain, 
> which adds the 
> > SIDs of the groups local to that domain (which may include universal
> > groups) of which the user is a member to the user's token. "
> > 
> > EN states he's in mixed-mode.  GC's are of minimal use in a 
> mixed-mode 
> > environment - and clearly play no part in Group SIDs as the LSA 
> > handles that for Global and LD groups.  The GC only cares 
> when we're 
> > dealing with Universals.
> > 
> > Tested this two years ago to prove it out to a customer.  They are 
> > mandatory for Exchange 2000.  Not, however for mixed mode 
> logon.  GC's 
> > are nice to have, especially if you want to use UPNs for logon.
> > 
> > In fact, if EN is using UPN's, the user will be denied.
> > 
> > Rick Kingslan - Microsoft MVP [Windows NT/2000]
> >   Microsoft Certified Trainer
> >   MCSA, MCSE+I - Windows NT / 2000
> > 
> > "Any sufficiently advanced technology
> > is indistinguishable from magic."
> >   ---  Arthur C. Clarke
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Al 
> > > Lilianstrom
> > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:35 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] 2 AD DCs but only one accepting 
> > > authentication
> > >
> > >
> > > You can't logon with out a GC. So when DC1 goes away so will your 
> > > ability to logon. See 
> > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q21697
> > 0 for more.
> > 
> >         al
> > 
> > > EN wrote:
> > >
> > > I have 2 AD DCs, and when the first created DC of the 
> domain fails, 
> > > the 2nd DC doesn't accept logons. I'm running mixed mode 
> the GC only 
> > > being on the first DC shouldn't matter right?  Has anyone else 
> > > encounted this type of problem?  When I promoted the 2nd 
> server to a 
> > > DC, everything went smoothly, sysvol and netlogon shares were 
> > > created properly.
> > >
> > >   Each DC has a DNS server as well, with the 1st DC having an AD 
> > > Integrated DNS, while the 2nd has a Primary DNS, and yet another 
> > > stand
> > 
> > > alone has a secondary dns.  All the dns records "seem" right, in 
> > > that the svr records are showing up in each DNS server.
> > >
> > >   Any ideas on what too look for to maybe solve this problem?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Ernesto
> > >
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Al Lilianstrom
> > CD/OSS/CSI
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> -- 
> 
> Al Lilianstrom
> CD/OSS/CSI
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to