Someone on slashdot.org (pro-linux site) indicated real-world problems
with AD
including:
"Groups aren't scalable, supporting
max 5000 users."
I want to recommend that we keep our people directory
flat but if groups have a maximum of
5000 users, this will be an obstacle. Would anyone care
to comment?
-----Original Message-----
From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:49 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limitations
From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:49 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limitations
Eoin,
Actually the size of the directory itself doesn't really affect
replication traffic (except when you bring up a new domain controller). Its the
amount of data that is changed, and how frequently it is changed, that drives
the replication traffic.
-gil
-----Original Message-----
From: T Bowman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory LimitationsEoin,I do not believe there is a hard limit. I do know it is capable of handling millions of objects.However, keep in mind that the size will affect replication and thus your network.T.-----------------------
Tony Bowman, MCSE, MCSA, CCNA
Harvest, AL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eoin Mooney
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:48 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] Active Directory LimitationsHi all,
I know this is probably a very general question , but is there a limit with relation to active directory size.
Number of folders created , data stored ,etc,etc
Regards
Eoin
