|
Does this apply to the "Domain Users" group ?!?
I ran a script against our Domain and returned over 10,000 users that are a member of "Domain Users"
-----Original Message-----
The 5000 user limit is not a 5000 "user" limit, it is a 5000 Direct member limit. I don't think anyone in their right mind would have 5000 users in one group. I would suggest nesting them to make them more manageable anyways.
FYI, .NET removes this limitation for the nutty people. -----Original
Message----- Someone on slashdot.org (pro-linux site) indicated real-world problems with AD including:
"Groups aren't scalable, supporting max 5000 users."
I want to recommend that we keep our people directory flat but if groups have a maximum of 5000 users, this will be an obstacle. Would anyone care to comment?
-----Original
Message----- Eoin,
Actually the size of the directory itself doesn't really affect replication traffic (except when you bring up a new domain controller). Its the amount of data that is changed, and how frequently it is changed, that drives the replication traffic.
-gil
|
Title: Message
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limitatio... AMAN, ALICE L. (JSC-GT4) (NASA)
- Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limi... Eric Yeoh
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limi... Hutchins, Mike
- Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory ... Eric Yeoh
- Re: [ActiveDir] Active Direct... David Adner
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limi... Parker, Edward
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory ... T Bowman
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory ... David Adner
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limi... Hutchins, Mike
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limi... Parker, Edward
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limi... Hutchins, Mike
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limi... Benton.Wink
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory ... T Bowman
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory ... David Stacer
- Re: [ActiveDir] Active Direct... Eric Yeoh
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Limi... Hutchins, Mike
