|
Leaving it up to the locator costs essentially nothing in this case. But the result may not be very “near” to the client.
See Mark Tucker’s mail; his explanation was correct… query DNS for all DCs in domain regardless of site, order according to SRV RR priority, arrange randomly (within priority level) according to SRV RR weight, and walk the list sending LDAP UDP pings to each DC until the first one responds, waiting 1/10th of a second between each “ping”.
Since most people don’t change the SRV RR priority or weight fields registered by the DC, you get a walk of a randomly arranged list.
-----Original Message-----
I haven't tested it myself, but I doubt very much. Assuming the programmers used reasonable data structures internally, the calculation should be pretty straightforward. Of all the things a DC does during authentication, I suspect that site determination is one of the quickest.
|
Title: Message
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Garello, Kenneth
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Rick Kingslan
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Tucker, Mark
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Gil Kirkpatrick
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Gil Kirkpatrick
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Gil Kirkpatrick
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Fugleberg, David A
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Stuart Kwan
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Gil Kirkpatrick
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Gil Kirkpatrick
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Tucker, Mark
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sites with no DC Gil Kirkpatrick
