Can you explain why?
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT?
You were told correctly.
One NIC in the DMZ is the better choice.
------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:55 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [ActiveDir] OT?
>
>
> I dunno if this is off topic..
> but which is more secure?
> a proxy (or isa server), with 1 NIC in a DMZ, or a server
> with 2 NICs .. one in the DMZ, one on the internal LAN..
> internal NIC has no default gateway.
> External NIC has WINS, SERVER service, Workstation service
> unbound from the NIC.
>
> im told a dual NICd proxy is a hole in the firewall.
>
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
