You are correct, sort of.

You can still do packet filtering and inspection on traffic not destined
back through your firewall - you just need to write the ruleset correctly.

Personally, were I to add a proxy box to my network, I'd put it inside the
firewall, with a single NIC, and set the firewall to only allow outbound
HTTP to/from that box.

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:mhr@;panduit.com] 
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:40 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT?
> 
> 
> Curious.. I notice all the MS docs for ISA and proxy say to 
> do it with 2 nics.. And you cant do any packet filtering or 
> stateful inspection with one nic in the server.
> 
> Ive also found Linux proxy documentation showing the same thing. 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] 
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:34 AM 
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT? 
> 
> 
> Because the 2 NIC solution results in a box bridging your 
> firewall. In other words, your firewall is no longer the only 
> path between your internal and external networks.
> 
> That's generally a bad idea. 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------ 
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE 
> Sr. Systems Administrator 
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity 
> Atlanta, GA 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:mhr@;panduit.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:06 AM 
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT? 
> > 
> > 
> > Can you explain why? 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:04 AM 
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT? 
> > 
> > 
> > You were told correctly. 
> > 
> > One NIC in the DMZ is the better choice. 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------ 
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE 
> > Sr. Systems Administrator 
> > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity 
> > Atlanta, GA 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message----- 
> > > From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:mhr@;panduit.com] 
> > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:55 AM 
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
> > > Subject: [ActiveDir] OT? 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I dunno if this is off topic.. 
> > > but which is more secure? 
> > > a proxy (or isa server), with 1 NIC in a DMZ,   or a server 
> > > with 2 NICs .. one in the DMZ, one on the internal LAN.. 
> > > internal NIC has no default gateway. 
> > > External NIC has WINS, SERVER service, Workstation service 
> > > unbound from the NIC. 
> > >  
> > > im told a dual NICd proxy is a hole in the firewall. 
> > > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm 
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm 
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ 
> > 
> > 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm 
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm 
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ 
> 
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to