Renames are fine. 

I don't see a point in the link speed in the name, you could put it in
the comments so it is still available.

Our naming standard goes something like this


Hub Sites
        NA    (Americas - located in North America)
        AP      (Asia Pacific)
        EU      (Europe)

Hub Sites dedicated to Exchange
        NAEXCH
        APEXCH
        EUEXCH

Remote Sites
        B<building#> so like B56345

Then the links all look like

        Hubsite Name - Remote Site  (or hub site - hub site for the big
main hub interconnections)

        NA-B56345
        NA-NAEXCH
        NA-EU
        EU-AP
        NA-AP
        
Etc.

I have no site link bridges. Simple 3 hub and spokes.


Cool thing is now with my site scripts when I create a site I specify
parameters like

Createsite DC sitename hub [metric if not default WAN]

Ex:

Createsite domaincontroller1 B45678 NA

>From that it knows the domain controller to work on (I like to target my
creates); what site to build, what two sites should be in the site link
and what the site link name should be and what the metric should be if
the default isn't good enough (it always is for me as I have a 3 hub hub
and spoke). 

So I would have the following objects after that

Site Object B45678
Site Link Object NA-B45678 with NA and B45678 sites in it. 


So I've shown mine... Who else wants to share?


   joe




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 6:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Sites and Site Link Naming Conventions


Todd's post was very timely as I was going to post this question tonight

anyway.  We're in the initial design phase for a potentially large AD 
environment (it'll start small with maybe 3 sites and a <10 DC's total,
but 
could eventually grow to 700 sites, each with a DC).

I'm curious what others have done for their naming conventions when it 
comes to Sites and Site Links (and Site Link Bridges, apparently.)  Does
it 
make sense to include the link speed in the name?  If so, does having to

rename links in the future (because of upgrades or whatnot) work fine or

should that be avoided?


David

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to