Nope. Its already installed.

The Windows Automatic Update client is included as part of Win2k SP3 and
later, and all versions of Windows XP.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:45 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] What is SUS?
> 
> 
> I am trying to run the WUAU.msi on a W2KSP4 client,  but get an error
> indicating I need W2KSP2.  The package I have is stamped 23 
> May 2002,  is
> there a later msi file ?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 10 September 2003 13:26
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] What is SUS?
> 
> 
> It stands for Software Update Services.  You can use it to 
> deploy updates to
> your clients.  You can setup an internal server that stores 
> updates that you
> download from the web.  Your clients will then use this 
> server to obtain
> their updates.   You can find more info about it at
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/windowsupdate/sus/
> -- 
> Tim Hines, MCSE, MCSA
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 8:17 AM
> Subject: [ActiveDir] What is SUS?
> 
> 
> Hey all..
> 
> No flames ok?
> I'm covered in jet fuel.
> 
> Could someone explain what SUS is?
> I thik it is for windows updates, but I am not sure, and if 
> it is something
> that would streamline my updates, then I would like to know more.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> John Parker, MCSE
> IS Admin.
> Senior Technical Specialist
> Digital Display Systems.
> 
> Alpha Video
> 7711 Computer Ave.
> Edina, MN. 55435
> 
> 952-896-9898 Local
> 800-388-0008 Watts
> 952-896-9899 Fax
> 612-804-8769 Cell
> 952-841-3327 Direct
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Be excellent to each other"
> ---End of Line---
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS Feedback...
> 
> 
> William,
> 
> We, too, run SUS with great success - much of the warts have 
> already been
> mentioned so I won't elaborate.
> 
> However, we knew that ther was an issue with users not 
> shutting of their
> systems.  What we implemented to resolve this and to insure 
> that updates did
> get applied - especially in the case of vulns like MS03-07 
> and MS03-26 - we
> have a script that will do a rolling 'restart' of systems.  
> Granted, our
> systems are named in a logical manner for our production 
> seats, but our
> staff seats are on their own subnet - so we just reboot 
> anything between
> specific IP ranges - and have it spaced out (by minutes, 
> hours, or days =
> depending on criticallity) so that the systems don't overload 
> the DCs and
> SUS systems, oh yeah - and the network <g>.
> 
> It's been effective for us for a fair amount of time (10 - 12 
> mos.) and we
> are running this in 14 of our remote locations as well as our 
> local campus
> WAN with 8 buildings.
> 
> Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT
> Microsoft MVP - Active Directory
> Associate Expert
> Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> William Lefkovics
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SUS Feedback...
> 
> We share the same issues.
> 
> But we have laptops that have traveled the country or just 
> get taken home
> each night, but haven't been rebooted in weeks.  They just 
> hibernate on
> battery power til next time they are opened.
> 
> Essentially, we have chosen to not shut off workstations at 
> days' end.  They
> remain running 24/7.  Updates for antivirus, patches for 
> applications or OS
> all happen after hours for desktops.
> 
> William
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:59 AM
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS Feedback...
> 
> 
> > I've been running SUS SP1 for a week or two now - finally 
> got time to 
> > implement it.
> >
> > I'd second a lot of the basic limitations of the product - its not
> perfect,
> > but it does do a good job with the basics. If you're aware of the 
> > limits, it's a good way to push the more critical OS layer stuff.
> >
> > The biggest issue I've got is dealing with the automatic 
> reboots - a 
> > lot
> of
> > MS patches (as you know) require restarts to take effect. 
> The decision 
> > as
> to
> > whether or not to force reboot isn't easy, and I wish there 
> was some 
> > form
> of
> > recurring reminder to reboot.
> >
> > In my environment, that can be an issue - I have a heavily laptop 
> > oriented client base, so I have to schedule the updates to 
> happen when 
> > they're here (I chose Noon), but that's a busy time for people, so 
> > forcing a reboot
> then
> > isn't a great option. Fortunately, most laptops get shut down and 
> > taken
> home
> > at night. My desktops, however, probably won't get 
> rebooted, so that's 
> > a problem. And more often than not, the desktops are on the 
> desks of 
> > people who are going to cause me pain (development and customer 
> > support).
> >
> > I'd like to be able to do some form of filtering (WMI?) for client 
> > type
> and
> > have different settings for different boxes, and I *think* 
> that's on 
> > the books for 2.0, but I don't know.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > Inovis Inc.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:12 PM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: [ActiveDir] SUS Feedback...
> > >
> > >
> > > Is anyone out there running Software Update Service?  I 
> want to gage 
> > > what the general opinion of the service is.  I personally 
> think that 
> > > there probably needs to be two approaches when it comes to a
> > > service like this.
> > > One is a pull service based on GPO agent configuration, the
> > > other is a push
> > > service based on a need to force workstation updates on
> > > down-level clients,
> > > and those that seem to ride outside the SUS zone.
> > >
> > > Any comments?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Todd Myrick
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> > >
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> >
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : 
> http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> List info   : 
> http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **************************************************************
> *********************************************
> This correspondence is confidential and is solely for the 
> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, 
> you must not use, disclose, copy, distribute or retain this 
> message or any part of it. If you are not the intended 
> recipient please delete this correspondence from your system 
> and notify the sender immediately.
> No warranty is given that this correspondence is free from 
> any virus. In keeping with good computer practice, you should 
> ensure that it is actually virus free. E-mail messages may be 
> subject to delays, non-delivery and unauthorised alterations 
> therefore, information expressed in this message is not given 
> or endorsed by Sx3 unless otherwise notified by our duly 
> authorised representative independent of this message.
> Sx3 is a trading name of Service and Systems Solutions 
> Limited, a limited company registered in Northern Ireland 
> under number NI 32979 whose registered office is at 120 
> Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5HT.
> **************************************************************
> *********************************************
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to