|
Nice reply Al – however I do not believe that the legacyExchangeDN of
the first administrative group has anything to do with the legacyExchangeDN of
a newly created user in AD. Well,
maybe I am missing something here.
I do not intend on “mucking about” with the attributes for anything
other than the users that need correction. Additionally, I question the fact about the ADC being the
mechanism involved with the setting.
The reason I state that is because I created a new user in AD in the
domain that handles the E55 server and then a mailbox for the user. Guess what? ADSI Edit shows the legacyExchangeDN attribute correctly for
that user and that information was populated via the ADC. Finally, I believe that there can be a
delivery issue involved when the user legacyExchangeDN does not match up with
what E55 “sees” in the DS attribute OBJ-DIST-NAME… R/Bill -----Original
Message----- http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q273863 is the description of how to do this. However, I should
caution you that mucking about with the legacyExchangeDN attribute is not a
good idea. Getting your users to live with it now is a better
approach. They will be living with it going forward since Exchange GAL in
Exchange 200x doesn't care about containers. You could also create ABV's
to mimic this, but again, I don't recommend spending much time on the legacy
system. At some point, you're
going to have to work with these users to make the change. If they cannot
make that change, there might be a reason to use the GAL views in Exchange 200x
and it's best to know that early. Finally, keep in mind
that the ADC is the mechanism involved in this setting. To move
them between 5.5 containers is not as simple as changing the legacyExchangeDN
since 5.x didn't understand or allow movement between containers; it requires
the Microsoft shuffle (copy, delete, create) on the 5.5 side + replication
times. In other words, there's a lot of moving parts to make
this scenario work. Luck! :) Al -----Original Message----- Al, The immediate thing that comes to mind is that in our
mixed mode environment [that we will have to live with for a while yet...] is
that in the E55 sites the GAL lists these folks as being in the Recipients
container (ou) where they are really in a different departmental container
(ou). Believe it or not - we have
users that insist on going to a container listing in the GAL and picking their
send to addresses! Short of that -
I am sure there are other issues.
Lastly, if MS put the attribute into AD - I think the attribute should
represent the user exactly and this is not the case. R/Bill -----Original
Message----- Plenty,
but I have a question first. Why are you wanting to change it? What
benefit is there if you change it? -----Original Message----- To
All, When I create a user in
AD the legacyExchangeDN attribute is always set to cn=Recipients no matter what
ou the user was created under. Using ADSI Edit to change the value to
reflect the correct setting fails as the value is immediately
changed back. Does anyone have any thoughts on this??? R/Bill |
Title: Message
- [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Brown, Bill [contractor]
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Brown, Bill [contractor]
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Mulnick, Al
- [ActiveDir] Using LDAP to turn off Recipient... Brown, Bill [contractor]
- [ActiveDir] Using LDAP to turn off Recip... Jerry Welch
- Re: [ActiveDir] Using LDAP to turn o... Manjeet
- RE: [ActiveDir] Using LDAP to turn o... Deji Akomolafe
- RE: [ActiveDir] Using LDAP to tu... Jerry Welch
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Brown, Bill [contractor]
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Brown, Bill [contractor]
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN deji
