|
Al, test-bed scenario:
empty root w/1 dc/gc, child domain A w/1 dc/gc E2K ADC installed, child
domain B w/1 dc/gc E55 ADC installed.
Created the new user in domain A and tests showed that the GAL in domain
B was not showing the new user in the proper container. Found the legacyExchangeDN to be
mis-represented. Created new user
in domain B and it displayed correctly. R/Bill -----Original
Message----- When you created the
mailbox, it was on a 5.5 server or a 2000 server? -----Original Message----- Nice reply Al - however I do not believe that the
legacyExchangeDN of the first administrative group has anything to do with the
legacyExchangeDN of a newly created user in AD. Well, maybe I am missing something here. I do not intend on "mucking
about" with the attributes for anything other than the users that need
correction. Additionally, I
question the fact about the ADC being the mechanism involved with the
setting. The reason I state that
is because I created a new user in AD in the domain that handles the E55 server
and then a mailbox for the user.
Guess what? ADSI Edit shows
the legacyExchangeDN attribute correctly for that user and that information was
populated via the ADC. Finally, I
believe that there can be a delivery issue involved when the user
legacyExchangeDN does not match up with what E55 "sees" in the DS
attribute OBJ-DIST-NAME... R/Bill -----Original
Message----- http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q273863 is the description of how to do this. However, I should
caution you that mucking about with the legacyExchangeDN attribute is not a
good idea. Getting your users to live with it now is a better
approach. They will be living with it going forward since Exchange GAL in
Exchange 200x doesn't care about containers. You could also create ABV's
to mimic this, but again, I don't recommend spending much time on the legacy
system. At some
point, you're going to have to work with these users to make the change.
If they cannot make that change, there might be a reason to use the GAL views
in Exchange 200x and it's best to know that early. Finally,
keep in mind that the ADC is the mechanism involved in this
setting. To move them between 5.5 containers is not as simple as changing
the legacyExchangeDN since 5.x didn't understand or allow movement between
containers; it requires the Microsoft shuffle (copy, delete, create) on the 5.5
side + replication times. In other words, there's a lot of moving parts
to make this scenario work. Luck! :) Al -----Original Message----- Al, The immediate thing that comes to mind is that in our
mixed mode environment [that we will have to live with for a while yet...] is
that in the E55 sites the GAL lists these folks as being in the Recipients container
(ou) where they are really in a different departmental container (ou). Believe it or not - we have users that
insist on going to a container listing in the GAL and picking their send to
addresses! Short of that - I am
sure there are other issues.
Lastly, if MS put the attribute into AD - I think the attribute should
represent the user exactly and this is not the case. R/Bill -----Original
Message----- Plenty,
but I have a question first. Why are you wanting to change it? What
benefit is there if you change it? -----Original Message----- To
All, When I create a user in
AD the legacyExchangeDN attribute is always set to cn=Recipients no matter what
ou the user was created under. Using ADSI Edit to change the value to
reflect the correct setting fails as the value is immediately
changed back. Does anyone have any thoughts on this??? R/Bill |
Title: Message
- [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Brown, Bill [contractor]
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Brown, Bill [contractor]
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Brown, Bill [contractor]
- [ActiveDir] Using LDAP to turn off Recip... Jerry Welch
- Re: [ActiveDir] Using LDAP to turn o... Manjeet
- RE: [ActiveDir] Using LDAP to turn o... Deji Akomolafe
- RE: [ActiveDir] Using LDAP to tu... Jerry Welch
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Brown, Bill [contractor]
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN Brown, Bill [contractor]
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT? - LEGACY EXCHANGE DN deji
