I personally don't put a lot of weight into the "save your top level domain for the Internet" argument. I've been hearing that since the W2K JDP and we are already on a second version of AD with no indication that saving your tld will be important in any way. You could always prefix an external forest root domain name with ext or external. This is a prime example of a "best practice" that many people swear by, but I doubt will ever be justified.
Just my $.02 :-) Robbie Allen http://www.rallenhome.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: John Reijnders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 4:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Name > > > You could use the .fin and/or .biz DNS names without getting > into any AD problems. However, you should think about the fact whether or > not you want to connect AD to the internet (not now but in the future?). > Don't place your bets on renaming your domains in the future using the new > domain renaming features in Windows Server 2003. The renaming is a very > complex proces which has significant impact on the availability of the > infrastructure. If you're sure you only want to use these names internally you can use these > extensions without running into problems. > > Cheers! > John > > -----Original Message----- > From: George Arezina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: woensdag 22 oktober 2003 15:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS Name > > Can someone please confirm if they have ever used, aside from > the standard > .com .org .net, for their AD implementation .biz or .fin domain name > structure. I am considering implementing nb.fin or nb.biz > domain name for > our new AD structure some time in the very near future. Would > such a name > have any side affects on AD or DNS? > > Another question not pertaining to the one above. I know > Windows 2003 server > has drastically changed its default security structure on its > folders and > volumes through either ACL or DACL. In my test environment, > when I created a > home folder and when I created a user through ADUC, I was > able to create a > user's home folder, but the user security ACL's were not > there. Under W2K, > when you share the home folder, create a new user, and create > a user's home > folder, you automatically created in the security tab the > user's name along > with his ACL. Does anyone know how to do the same thing in > Windows 2003 > server? > > Thanks > George > > �� > George Arezina > BA, A+, Net+, MCSE 2000 > Information Technology Consultant > National Bank of Serbia > Pop Lukina 7-9, 11000 Belgrade. > P E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > g Phone:+381 (11) 3202-474 > GSM:� +381 (63) 342-321 > � > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
