Yeah; enterprise version is nice, but for the price difference on a DC, I
couldn't justify it. Not enough benefit...

**********************
Charlie Kaiser
MCSE, CCNA
Systems Engineer
Essex Credit / Brickwalk
510 985 0975 x5083
********************** 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Baudino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows Standard Server 2003 or 
> Enterprise Se rver 2003 as DCs
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Charlie,
> 
> Thanks much.  It's what I thought but just needed to be sure. 
>  The document explains it well too.  Budgeting for a rollout 
> and would hate to get that simple piece of the puzzle wrong...
> 
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Charlie Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@mail.activedir.org 
> on 10/29/2003 11:27:58 PM
> 
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Sent by:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> To:    "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> 
> Subject:    RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows Standard Server 2003 
> or Enterprise
>        Se rver 2003 as DCs
> 
> 
> I talked to Compaq/HP (whatever you want to call them this 
> week) about this issue since we saw the same thing when we 
> bought ours. Same scenario. We went with Standard Edition for 
> our DCs since there was no performance hit due to the 
> hyperthreading issue, according to their support dept and 
> what I could find on their site and at MS. There's a paper 
> available at: 
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/hwdev/platform/proc/HT-Windows.m
spx
That talks about the licensing bit as well as a lot of tech info, but you
don't need Enterprise for that server. Running fine for me...

**********************
Charlie Kaiser
MCSE, CCNA
Systems Engineer
Essex Credit / Brickwalk
510 985 0975 x5083
**********************
> That said, if we are building HP DL380G3's with hyperthreading would 
> we need Enterprise Server 2003 or Standard?  We're planning on using 
> them for domain controllers and we're trying to remember why we 
> ordered Enterprise Server 2003 when it appears that the much less
> expensive Standard Server 2003 would suffice.
>
> We're running DL380G3's and BL20pG2's with two processors and Standard 
> Server 2003 seems to be running fine.  But is it taking full advantage 
> of the processors or running in some sort of crippled mode where it 
> doesn't utilize the hyperthreading?  Perfmon seems to show that it's 
> using both of the physicals and both of the virtuals...but...
> Mike
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
 List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/




 ******************* PLEASE NOTE *******************
 This E-Mail/telefax message and any documents accompanying this
transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information and is
intended solely for the addressee(s) named above.  If you are not the
intended addressee/recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of,
disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on the contents of this
E-Mail/telefax information is strictly prohibited and may result in legal
action against you. Please reply to the sender advising of the error in
transmission and immediately delete/destroy the message and any
accompanying documents.  Thank you.

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to