Yeah - that's a given. It won't if I wrote it. Still not enough free time in my life to figure out threaded program development. I understand it, just not enough time to get to writing it.
Not to mention VBScript doesn't do threading all that well...;) -------------------------------------------------------------- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 4:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows Standard Server 2003 or > Enterprise Se rver 2003 as DCs > > > "Some applications can and some can't - but there's no > definitive way to say > an app can or can't do it." > > Unless, of course, you wrote it.... ;o) > > Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT > Microsoft MVP - Active Directory > Associate Expert > Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Roger Seielstad > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:32 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows Standard Server 2003 or > Enterprise Se > rver 2003 as DCs > > Yes, it is taking full advantage of the hyperthreading. > > Keep in mind that hyperthreading IS NOT two separate > processors. It is a > parallel execution path within the processor, which can't always be > leveraged. Some applications can and some can't - but there's > no definitive > way to say an app can or can't do it. > > Roger > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis Inc. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Baudino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 12:00 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Windows Standard Server 2003 or Enterprise > > Server 2003 as DCs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > Dumb question but one that for some strange reason we can't get a > > definitive answer about. Xeon processors with > hyperthreading seem to > > appear as two processors instead of one to both Windows 2000 Server > > and Server 2003. I thought that 2003 would be able to > differentiate > > between the physical processors and the virtual processors. In > > addition, I've seen conflicting documentation on Microsoft's site > > stating that Standard Server > > 2003 supports up to two processors and supports up to four > processors. > > > > That said, if we are building HP DL380G3's with > hyperthreading would > > we need Enterprise Server 2003 or Standard? We're planning > on using > > them for domain controllers and we're trying to remember why we > > ordered Enterprise Server 2003 when it appears that the much less > > expensive Standard Server > > 2003 would suffice. > > > > We're running DL380G3's and BL20pG2's with two processors > and Standard > > Server 2003 seems to be running fine. But is it taking > full advantage > > of the processors or running in some sort of crippled mode where it > > doesn't utilize the hyperthreading? Perfmon seems to show > that it's > > using both of the physicals and both of the virtuals...but... > > > > Any info would be appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > > > > > > ******************* PLEASE NOTE ******************* This > > E-Mail/telefax message and any documents accompanying this > > transmission may contain privileged and/or confidential information > > and is intended solely for the addressee(s) named above. > If you are > > not the intended addressee/recipient, you are hereby > notified that any > > use of, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on > the contents > > of this E-Mail/telefax information is strictly prohibited and may > > result in legal action against you. Please reply to the sender > > advising of the error in transmission and immediately > delete/destroy > > the message and any accompanying documents. Thank you. > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > > List archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > > > > List info : > http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
