Thanks for the links; I'll have a look at them ASAP. > I'm not one of the big brains on this list however I've been looking at distribution groups etc in Exchange 2003 and have a couple of article links which you may not have seen. Not sure if they will help > > The Role of Groups and Access Control Lists in Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server Deployments > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp? url=/technet/prodtechnol/exchange/exchange2000/plan/RGACLE2K.ASP > > The other relates to expansion servers which may relate to your perfomance questions. > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;328791 > > Regards, > > Jacqui > > > from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:14:17 > > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange 2003 DL Management in a multi-domain forest > > > > Good Morning: > > > > Long time lurker, 1st time poster :-) This topic was somewhat covered in a > > thread initiated by Joe, but I have a follow-up question. > > > > Our scenario: > > Approximately 6800 users. A Windows 2003 AD design with an empty forest root > > domain, and 2 child domains, 2 DCs per domain. The bulk of the users will be in > > one child domain, and there won't be much interaction between the 2 child > > domains. The root and the main child domain will both be within the data centre > > in a single site. We will be deploying Exchange 2003 in the main child domain. > > We are in the lab proof of concept phase, and the question has arisen whether > > when users attempt to manage DLs once we're in Exchange native mode, if they'll > > be potentially referred to a GC in the root domain, thus having their > > modification attempt fail. The time to determine this is now, before we move to > > the pilot (which involves deploying AD, then deploying the 1st E2K3 server). > > > > My initial thought was to simulate a heavy messaging load to DLs (UGs) with > > Loadsim. Using that approach, though, is there a relatively easy way to > > determine what GCs are being hit? Or is there a completely different approach I > > should be taking? > > > > Or, is the thoughts of the big brains on this list that this won't be an issue > > at all? Any and all feedback would be greatly appreciated. > > > > ADthanksVANCE, > > > > Andy Schan > > Messaging > > Contractor > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
