Yes you absolutely will run into the issue. 

The problem has nothing to do with load, it is how DSPROXY hands out GC's to
clients. If you have GC's from multiple domains in the site where your
exchange servers are, the exchange servers will have them all (up to I think
25 or something like that) in its GC list, any and all of those are valid to
be given out to ANY client requesting a GC irregardless of the domain of the
client or the user. You must break out your Exchange stuff into single
domain AD sites or you must hard code the Exchange Servers DSACCESS list or
hardcode the clients. 

On the positive side I really escalated this problem within MS as an MVP and
our MS Premier Alliance folks really escalated this problem through their
channels. Although Exchange Dev dismissed and said it would be corrected
previously, they are now being forced to look at it again. 

My recommendation to everyone this list is if you have multiple domain GCss
in a single AD site and use Exchange 2000/3 call now and bitch to MS about
this functionality. Initially they falled back on the old tried and true,
people don't really have this problem, it is just you guys because you are
doing things differently... 

Right off the bat we know it can affect DL's, Delegates, and email Certs. 


  joe


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 7:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Good Morning:

Long time lurker, 1st time poster :-) This topic was somewhat covered in a
thread initiated by Joe, but I have a follow-up question.

Our scenario:
Approximately 6800 users. A Windows 2003 AD design with an empty forest root
domain, and 2 child domains, 2 DCs per domain. The bulk of the users will be
in one child domain, and there won't be much interaction between the 2 child
domains. The root and the main child domain will both be within the data
centre in a single site. We will be deploying Exchange 2003 in the main
child domain. 
We are in the lab proof of concept phase, and the question has arisen
whether when users attempt to manage DLs once we're in Exchange native mode,
if they'll be potentially referred to a GC in the root domain, thus having
their modification attempt fail. The time to determine this is now, before
we move to the pilot (which involves deploying AD, then deploying the 1st
E2K3 server).

My initial thought was to simulate a heavy messaging load to DLs (UGs) with
Loadsim. Using that approach, though, is there a relatively easy way to
determine what GCs are being hit? Or is there a completely different
approach I should be taking?

Or, is the thoughts of the big brains on this list that this won't be an
issue at all? Any and all feedback would be greatly appreciated.

ADthanksVANCE,

Andy Schan
Messaging
Contractor

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to