It strikes me that excliding *.dit is probably all that's necessary on the
DCs

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: AD as a possible target of attack? RE: 
> [ActiveDir] Virus softwareon DC
> 
> 
> > DO scan your DCs and reconsider excluding things like the Sysvol
> 
> I fully agree with you here, John.  I have seen for myself 
> how good FRS is at distributing viruses throughout the 
> infrastructure in short period of time!!  Some of the major 
> AV vendors previously had products that caused problems when 
> scanning SYSVOL, but the recent offerings have resolved this. 
>  Bottom line:  there is no good reason not to include SYSVOL 
> (as long as you've checked with your AV vendor first).
> 
> Tony
> 
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> Wrom: NNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKEDOTWFAOBUZXU
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date:  Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:18:52 +0100
> 
> I totally agree with all the guys out there that urge you to scan your
> DCs!!! I've been thinking about this issue for some time and 
> I've come to
> the conclusion that Active Directory would be THE IDEAL 
> target for a virus
> attack. The robustness of AD replication makes it the ideal 
> distribution
> mechanism for virusses. Hey ... distributing virusses by mail 
> is ancient
> technology ;-). Why not use the intense integration of 
> Exchange 2000+ and AD
> to transport a virus from Exchange to AD? 
> 
> No guys... I'm very serious! DO scan your DCs and reconsider excluding
> things like the Sysvol because this is another possible 
> target for the sick
> minds out there that like to screw up enterprise 
> environments! It's only a
> matter of time before the first AD virus is a fact of life we 
> have to deal
> with!
> 
> So go out and check (before you go to bed) whether or not 
> dat-file updates
> are really succeeding ;-).
> 
> Cheers!
> John
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Wrom: WLSZLKBRNVW
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10-12-2003 18:07
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virus software on DC
> 
> Sorry, I have to throw-in my two cents. I exclude the sysvol/sysvol
> folder and sub-folders, but run the real-time scanner on everything
> else.  These two folders deal with replication and are too volatile to
> play with.
> 
> S
> 
> *****************************************
> Steve Shaff
> Active Directory / Exchange Administrator
> Corillian Corporation
> (W) 503.629.3538 (C) 503.807.4797 (F) 503.629.3674 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Wrom: WCUFPEGAUTFJMVRESKPNKMBIPBARHDMNNS
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Burkes, Jeremy
> [contractor]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virus software on DC
> 
> Same here, never had any problems either.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Wrom: KVFVWRKJVZCMHVIBGDADRZFSQHYUCDDJBLVLMHAALPTCXLYRWTQTIPWI
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virus software on DC
> 
> 
> We run Symantec AV corporate edition and don't exclude any 
> directories.
> We haven't had any problems related to AV software...... 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> Wrom: GYOKSTTZRCLBDXRQBGJSNBOHMKHJYFMYXO
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Free, Bob
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virus software on DC
> 
>  >What directories should I not be scanning?
> 
> We use the exclusions in this list-
> 
> 822158 - Virus Scanning Recommendations on a Windows 2000 Domain
> Controller:
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;822158
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
>       Wrom: EAIJJPHSCRTNHGSWZIDREXCAXZOWCONEUQZAAFX
>       Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:30 AM
>       To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virus software on DC
>       
>       
>       We run Trend here.
>       Never have run into any issues and we are using the realtime
> scan.
>       Just out of curiosity though, I am scanning all except for a few
> select dirs/
>       What directories should I not be scanning?
> 
> 
> 
>       John Parker, MCSE 
>       IS Admin. 
>       Senior Technical Specialist 
>       Alpha Display Systems. 
> 
>       Alpha Video 
>       7711 Computer Ave. 
>       Edina, MN. 55435 
>         
>       952-896-9898 Local 
>       800-388-0008 Watts 
>       952-896-9899 Fax 
>       612-804-8769 Cell 
>       952-841-3327 Direct 
> 
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>       "Be excellent to each other" 
>       ---End of Line--- 
> 
> 
>       -----Original Message-----
>       Wrom: ISHJEXXIMQZUIVOTQNQEMSFDULHPQQWOYIYZUNNYCG
>       Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:24 AM
>       To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Virus software on DC
>       
>       
> 
>       I do, but I exclude the AD files, and I do not have real-time
> scanning enabled, just periodic scheduled scans. Does not 
> seem to cause
> any problems.
> 
>        
> 
>       <mc>
> 
>       -----Original Message-----
>       Wrom: PKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPYOQKEDOTWFAOBUZXUWLS
>       Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:17 AM
>       To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Subject: [ActiveDir] Virus software on DC
> 
>        
> 
>       This may be a dumb question, but do you guys have virus scanning
> software on your DCs? I have been confused if the virus scanner slows
> the machine down or not. Thanks
> 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> List info   : 
> http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%> 40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to