|
Same thing we’re looking at
Dennis. We have a
lot of PSTs on user Home drives of all
places. :-/ There is also the problem that PSTs don’t play well w/
incremental or differential backups.
If someone downloads one piece of email to that stupid thing, that means
you backup the whole [EMAIL PROTECTED] thing. -m From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Depp, Dennis M. My recommendation is to look at an
archiving solution for your Exchange mail. These are offered by several
companies including IXOS, EAS, and Legato to name a few. My belief is if
mail is important enough to keep, it should be kept in a central managed servers.
While PSTs on a file server meet this requirement PSTs are an inefficient
storage medium. (due to loss of single instance storage (sis).)
Many of the archive vendors maintain SIS and claim better compression ratios
than mail stored in the Exchange information store. Also these solutions
replace the email with a stub. This stub allows users of Outlook seamless
access to their mail. There is also a central management console that
could be search the entire archive if desired. This could be beneficial
in legal cases. There are a few drawbacks with storing PST
files on a file server. If the drive the PST files are on ever fills up,
every PST on the drive that is opened will be corrupted. There is also
the problem of backing up PST files if the user keeps Outlook open all the
time. Dennis From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Celone, Mike I'd also be
interested in how everyone handles these files. Right now we run Exchange
5.5 and have a 350MB limit on user's mailboxes. However for many users
this is not enough space. Many of them send huge files through email or
are just unable or unwilling to give up old emails. What we've been doing
is setting up users with PST files on their home drives so this way we still
have a backup of them and we suggest they use them as archives. Most of
our users have at least a 100Mbit link to their file server so speed isn't too
much of an issue even though PST files are not suggested to be used over a LAN
link. Our solution is
far from perfect and doesn't even work that well. It still presents
problems when PST files get huge and go corrupt. Has anyone ever
looked into programs like Veritas Storage Migrator? Mike From: Pelle,
Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm sorry for the off topic post, however I'd like some
input from the field on a subject we've been throwing around for a while now. That is: what do we do with PST files in Outlook?
We're replacing EVERY desktop or laptop in the company and have the opportunity
to GET RID OF PST files. Our users abuse the HE11 out of them. The
PST files get so big that they end up corrupt - or- take a half an hour to open
b/c the file size is 800 - 1 GB... It's tough to manage!!! What are your thoughts on this? How do others manage
this? Your comments, thoughts, etc are greatly appreciated! Joe
Pelle Infrastructure Architect Information Technology Valassis / IT Tel 734.591.7324 Fax 734.632.6151 This message may have included
proprietary or protected information. This message and the information
contained herein are not to be further communicated without my express written
consent. |
- [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Pelle, Joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Christopher Hummert
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files John Weber
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Celone, Mike
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Comeau, Steven
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Celone, Mike
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Depp, Dennis M.
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Depp, Dennis M.
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files jacqui . hurst
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files james . cate
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Depp, Dennis M.
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Pelle, Joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files Martin Tuip
