I agree that archving is the best solution. This is something that my client is currently looking into. As I understand it the cost is quite large up front but I guess the longer term savings are beneficial.
If you think you company might be able to fund such work then I would start writing your business case now. There are many savings and benefits to be had from introducing such a system. Some have already been mentioned in this thread. Another area to consider is information management. PST are not manageable and cannot be searched for old information. Archived files can. The introduction of archiving will improve your Exchange servers performance by keeping the DBs smaller and will expand their lifespan. If you can't afford an archiving solution (my last client couldn't) then alternates are few. You could remove the ability to create PST (risk users saving MSG files, even larger) but other than that all I ever achieved was highlighting to management that two thirds of their total file share was PST data and that something needed to be done. They then went out and targeted individuals with large amounts of PST data. This is not a scalable solution I guess. If you do have a large environment though you might be able to swing a good business case for archiving. > from: "Depp, Dennis M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:55:41 > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files > > My recommendation is to look at an archiving solution for your Exchange > mail. These are offered by several companies including IXOS, EAS, and > Legato to name a few. My belief is if mail is important enough to keep, > it should be kept in a central managed servers. While PSTs on a file > server meet this requirement PSTs are an inefficient storage medium. > (due to loss of single instance storage (sis).) Many of the archive > vendors maintain SIS and claim better compression ratios than mail > stored in the Exchange information store. Also these solutions replace > the email with a stub. This stub allows users of Outlook seamless > access to their mail. There is also a central management console that > could be search the entire archive if desired. This could be beneficial > in legal cases. > > There are a few drawbacks with storing PST files on a file server. If > the drive the PST files are on ever fills up, every PST on the drive > that is opened will be corrupted. There is also the problem of backing > up PST files if the user keeps Outlook open all the time. > > Dennis > > _____ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Celone, Mike > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 4:16 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files > > > I'd also be interested in how everyone handles these files. Right now > we run Exchange 5.5 and have a 350MB limit on user's mailboxes. However > for many users this is not enough space. Many of them send huge files > through email or are just unable or unwilling to give up old emails. > What we've been doing is setting up users with PST files on their home > drives so this way we still have a backup of them and we suggest they > use them as archives. Most of our users have at least a 100Mbit link to > their file server so speed isn't too much of an issue even though PST > files are not suggested to be used over a LAN link. > > Our solution is far from perfect and doesn't even work that well. It > still presents problems when PST files get huge and go corrupt. Has > anyone ever looked into programs like Veritas Storage Migrator? > > Mike > > _____ > > From: Pelle, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: PST files > > > > I'm sorry for the off topic post, however I'd like some input from the > field on a subject we've been throwing around for a while now. > > > > That is: what do we do with PST files in Outlook? We're replacing EVERY > desktop or laptop in the company and have the opportunity to GET RID OF > PST files. Our users abuse the HE11 out of them. The PST files get so > big that they end up corrupt - or- take a half an hour to open b/c the > file size is 800 - 1 GB... It's tough to manage!!! > > > > What are your thoughts on this? How do others manage this? > > > > Your comments, thoughts, etc are greatly appreciated! > > > > Joe Pelle > > Infrastructure Architect > > Information Technology > > Valassis / IT > > 19975 Victor Parkway Livonia, MI 48152 > > Tel 734.591.7324 Fax 734.632.6151 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <a href= List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
