Title: Message
*cough*
*splutter*
HAHAHAHAHA.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

Firstly, it won't be called SUS 2.0.  It will apparently be called the very unfortunate name of WUS - Windows Update Services.  Yes,  jokes have started, and WUS is getting tripped and beat up by all the other software bullies.
 
However, there is destined to be, as I understand it, an Application Programming Interface for WUS (and, no - I'm not making this up...)  So, now we have the WUS API
 
As I mentioned on another list, to my knowledge - this is only served with Sushi......
 

Rick Kingslan  MCSE, MCSA, MCT, CISSP
Microsoft MVP:
Windows Server / Directory Services
Windows Server / Rights Management
Associate Expert
Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
WebLog - www.msmvps.com/willhack4food
 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

More public info will be forthcoming after this week's Microsoft Management Summit.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philadelphia, Lynden - Revios Toronto
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:31 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

Where can I find out more information on SUS version 2

 

 

Lynden


From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:02 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

 

I'm running SUS 1.1 quite successfully for about 700 client machines (and servers). SUS 2, which is due in beta within the next 30 days or so, is going to add Office and a few other products for patching, which really is all that SUS is missing.

 

I prefer the SUS methodology of an agent on the client that pulls down the updates as they are available - we have a lot of highly mobile users so that really makes things work well for us. Things like HKNetCheck require the box be online when you push the patches, which doesn't work well in a lot of environments.

 

Roger

--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cariglia, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

I am in the process of looking at alternatives to distribute/manage Microsoft patches.  We have SUS running in a lab setup and it seems alright.  My question is are there superior products out there that someone has used and can recommend that work well with AD?  Running AD with an empty root and 2 child domains where the users reside, users are either Windows 2000 Pro or XP Pro.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

            Thank You,

 

 

Dan

 

Reply via email to