Easy to fix this. Tell your Exchange guy to show you the Matrix he's looking
at to draw his "replicate like crazy" conclusion. Then tell him that AD-intg
can easily be reversed IF crazy things start happening.
 
>From where I'm standing, AD-intg does not induce crazy behaviors. Oftentime,
when you get crazy behaviors, it will be caused by "something else". There
are attributes that are not indexed by design, and there are occassion for
referrals and Exchange (or more accurately, Outlook) will sometimes complain
during referral chasing. But, these have nothing to do with your DNS.
 
 
Sincerely,

D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday?  -anon

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Sent: Mon 6/28/2004 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's



Thanks for the second set of eyes. 

I have an Exchange guy that is trying to argue against the inclusion of AD
Integrated DNS zones, because in his POV the number of changes to DNS
records would incur would cause the GC's replicate like crazy. 

I haven't heard anyone really complain to loudly about AD Integrated DNS
cause huge problems, and actually the benefit of AD Integrated DNS is the
ability to ride on top of AD replication, instead of having a dozen
different replication architectures.

If you call can't tell as of late, I am catering to a couple of Chicken
Little in the office, with all my request for additional information.

Todd


-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS Records and GC's

Todd

I don't think the delay would be an LDAP referral (although I've been known
to be wrong before!).  The GC contains all the DNS zone objects and DNS node
objects in the forest.

The GC doesn't show the more interesting attributes.  Neither dnsProperty
(for dnsZone objects) nor dnsRecord (for dnsNode objects) are part of the
Partial Attribute Set.

It appears that the basic info is indeed in the GC, but it's not really that
helpful.

Tony

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
Wrom: XISHJEXXIMQZUIVOTQNQEMSFDULHPQQWOYIYZUNNYCGPKYL
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:47:26 -0400

I have a quick question.  In Windows 2000.  If AD-Integrated storage is used
for DNS zone data.  Is the data indexed in GC's or is it just the zone info?

I used LDP to connect to a GC, and I was able to browse the NC of a domain
that had AD-Integrated DNS.  When it came to looking at the data within the
DNS zone it took a while to get that info, leading me to think it might have
required a referral to get the extended information.

Thanks,
Todd
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/






________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org



                  
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to