Read KB 325379. Although this document is about upgrading DCs to 2003, it has some 
good information you need to know - particularly if you are running Exchange 2000.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacob Stabl
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 8:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W2K3 with W2K2


So what I am hearing is that I can go ahead and put the Windows 2003 server in place 
after I run adprep /forestprep and adprep /domainprep.  I understand I will not have 
all the capabilities of W2k3 but that's not what I am concerned about.  I just want to 
have that box in place so when I do decide to update a w2k3 server is already in place.


--
Jake

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grillenmeier, Guido
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 2:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W2K3 with W2K2

"The Win2K3 will have to get the roles, at least the PDCE and the Domain Naming master 
roles, otherwise your domain will not function correctly" 

This is not correct - the domain will still function perfectly well, but you won't be 
able to leverage some of the new features of Win2k3, which you'll only get after 
you've transferred those roles (e.g. Application Partitions, new 
well-known-security-principals and groups, Quota container etc.).

However, you won't have a chance to add a 2003 DC to the 2000 domain prior to prepping 
it with the 2003 schema and domain updates (ADPREP) - see other reply with link to KB. 
 So in a way Windows 2003 will have to "take over the domain" since you need to plan 
your schema update carefully.  Still, you can stick to your 2000 DCs and FSMO role 
holders until you feel comfortable to move them.

/Guido

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 11:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W2K3 with W2K2

Let's agree that there is no PDC/BDC concept. Now, if all you want to do is get your 
Domain ready for when you will eventually move to 2003, then you should just run the 
adprep /forestprep and adprep /domainprep in your domain and wait. IF you want to get 
a win2K3 DC into the Domain now, then there is this concept called WITO (hello, Joe 
:)). It's the "Walk In, Take Over" principle. The Win2K3 will have to get the roles, 
at least the PDCE and the Domain Naming master roles, otherwise your domain will not 
function correctly, and many of the benefits of a Win2K3 Domain will NOT be available 
to you. I have been able to get a win2K3 DC to install successfully into a test domain 
without transferring the roles or upgrading the DC that originally has these roles, 
but what I've heard and read is that is not something you want to do in a production 
environment.
 
The people who taught me that (and wrote the book on that) are on this list. They may 
be able to explain further.
 
 
Sincerely,

D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday?  -anon

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jacob Stabl
Sent: Wed 7/21/2004 1:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] W2K3 with W2K2



I know this issue has been talked about before but searching through some old post in 
my inbox I didn't find the exact answer I was looking for.

Is there a problem in joining a Window 2003 server as the BDC of in a Windows 2000 
network?  Will there be any problems or unavailable features? I don't want Windows 
2003 to take over the domain.  Reason for doing this is so next year if I decide to 
upgrade the domain to Windows 2003 it will be easier, I just move roles and such to 
that server.  In my simple mind this all makes sense.  Any suggestions?

Thanks

--
Jacob Stabl
Network Engineer
Plain Local Schools
http://eagle.stark.k12.oh.us
Work: 330.492.3500 x.383
Cell: 330.495.7243

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to