|
Well I am no lawyer either but the
disclaimer was attached at the request (directive) of our legal team. They
also came up with the content of the message. I have not been following
the specifics behind it but I was told (legal term – hearsay) that it was
a direct result of some litigation and recent legislation here in CA. Again
I have no specifics but will do a little checking. It also had something
to do with showing due diligence since we are in public education and a lot of
correspondence with parents, colleagues, and the state/feds happen via e-mail. Educators
have been known to not be the most technical bunch and are often sending email
to the wrong person (not sure how the “intended recipient” falls
into that like Deji points out). However, the thought has been that if
the recipient is clearly not the intended recipient that they do the right
thing and delete the message instead of forwarding it on for some other gain. There
are a lot of people critical of public education that would love to get
information on a student’s IEP and show the “tax payer’s
money at work”. Other than that it is just more overhead
on our messaging environment as far as I am concerned causing our help desk to receive
more calls about this both from the sender (confused because they never typed
this in) or the recipient wondering if they should “keep” the
message or not. I do see more and more law firms and government agencies that
we deal with that attach these disclaimers which is why we started doing it in
the first place – monkey see, monkey do. Brian From: joe
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Does anyone know if the disclaimer like
the one below are actually legally binding on anyone? And if the answer is yes,
has it ever really been tested in court? You don't have to agree to
anything to read the email, you just look and by the point you see the
disclaimer, it is too late, you have picked up the information in the
note. The fact that you don't necessarily agree to it I think would mean you
could forward it as you wish unless you worked for the company who stuck the
disclaimer on the note in the first place. I think telling me I have to delete
it if it doesn't pertain to me is like telling me I have to close my ears
and forget anything I hear if a neighbor says something within my range and
then says it can't be disclosed. joe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of I need to create about 3400 user accounts, create home
folders and assign the appropriate user and group permissions to the home
drives automagically. We are using Windows Server 2003 and AD with a
single domain. I know how to create the user accounts and home folders but
not sure the best approach to assign the permissions. Any suggestions on
doing all three or at least the permissions part. Thanks - Brian CAPISTRANO UNIFIED This communication and any documents, files, or previous
e-mail messages attached to it constitute an electronic communication within
the scope of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This
communication may contain non-public, confidential, or legally privileged
information intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). The
unlawful interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly
prohibited under 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable laws. CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DISCLAIMER: This communication and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages attached to it constitute an electronic communication within the scope of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This communication may contain non-public, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). The unlawful interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited under 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable laws. |
- RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question Stockbrugger, Brian L.
- RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Quest... Rick Kingslan
- RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Quest... Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Quest... Stockbrugger, Brian L.
- RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Quest... Perdue David J Contr InDyne/Enterprise IT
- RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Quest... Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Quest... Stockbrugger, Brian L.
- RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Quest... Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Quest... Stockbrugger, Brian L.
