|
Both Outlook and Exchange are users of NetBIOS name
resolution - to wit, in the general case, WINS.
Outlook uses it to determine where to find
its Exchange server to connect to and sometimes for what DC to use (GC
information comes from DNS unless overridden by a registry item). Outlook will
normally fall back to DNS except in some pathological conditions. Documented,
but not public I don't think (my copy is dated during OL 2003 beta testing and
it could've changed since then - I haven't run a network trace like joe probably
has).
The easiest thing to note about Exchange is that Exchange
servers (take a look at them in your CN=Servers,CN=<Administrative
Group>,CN=Administrative Groups,CN=<Organization Name>,CN=Microsoft
Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,<domain>) aren't known by a FQDN or
DN or GUID back into the A/D. Do some searching with ADSIedit for yourself on
that topic. :-P Since Exchange is a forest-wide entity, hostnames could be
duplicated in the DNS (note: I didn't say FQDN's - I said hostnames), but they
can't be duplicated in WINS.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Sun Mar 06 12:55:30 2005 Subject: [ActiveDir] WINS Is WINS still needed for exchange 2003? Some have said outlook still needs WINS. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ |
Title: Re: [ActiveDir] WINS
- RE: [ActiveDir] WINS Michael B. Smith
- RE: [ActiveDir] WINS Dan DeStefano
- RE: [ActiveDir] WINS Van Noy, Glen
- RE: [ActiveDir] WINS Salandra, Justin A.
- RE: [ActiveDir] WINS Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] WINS ChuckGaff
