|
In this scenario, I’d recommend
Primary to another and secondary to self. Deji From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Noah Eiger Hi – I have just been brought into a situation where a client has
several poorly connected (VPN and slow connections to the Internet) sites in a
single W2k domain. Each site has a single DC that runs AD-integrated DNS.
Previously, most of the DCs had tombstoned. Microsoft walked the in-house guy
through demoting and re-promoting everything. The question is this: where should each DC’s DNS
point? I have always thought they should point to themselves and only
themselves. The DNS server forwards to the Internet (as everything is poorly
connected). The in-house tech said Microsoft told him to point each DC’s
primary DNS to the FSMO-role holder and then to itself as secondary. Any thoughts? -- nme |
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? deji
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? brent.westmoreland
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? James_Day
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? Noah Eiger
- Re: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? chuckgaff
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? deji
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? Rocky Habeeb
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? deji
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? Noah Eiger
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? deji
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...? Kern, Tom
