Agreed - and admiring Dejis ability to say in 12 words what I took 2 pages
to type.

James R. Day
Active Directory Core Team
Office of the Chief Information Officer
National Park Service
(202) 354-1464 (direct)
(202) 371-1549 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


|---------+---------------------------------->
|         |           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|         |           dca.com>               |
|         |           Sent by:               |
|         |           [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|         |           tivedir.org            |
|         |                                  |
|         |                                  |
|         |           03/29/2005 01:03 PM EST|
|         |           Please respond to      |
|         |           ActiveDir              |
|---------+---------------------------------->
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                             
                                                 |
  |       To:       <[email protected]>                              
                                                 |
  |       cc:       (bcc: James Day/Contractor/NPS)                             
                                                 |
  |       Subject:  RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...?                     
                                                 |
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Agreed

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 12:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...?

In this scenario, Iâd recommend Primary to another and secondary to self.

Deji


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 9:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] DNS should point to...?

Hi â

I have just been brought into a situation where a client has several poorly
connected (VPN and slow connections to the Internet) sites in a single W2k
domain. Each site has a single DC that runs AD-integrated DNS. Previously,
most of the DCs had tombstoned. Microsoft walked the in-house guy through
demoting and re-promoting everything.

The question is this: where should each DCâs DNS point? I have always
thought they should point to themselves and only themselves. The DNS server
forwards to the Internet (as everything is poorly connected). The in-house
tech said Microsoft told him to point each DCâs primary DNS to the
FSMO-role holder and then to itself as secondary.

Any thoughts?

-- nme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]       šŠV«r¯yÊ&ý§-Š÷4™¨¥iËb½çb®Šà

Reply via email to