|
The more I think about this this and try to see "the
boss's" viewpoint, the more I wonder if "the boss" is picking up on the overall
vibe of the community about how important DNS is and the fact that so many
issues are tracked back to DNS Issues.
If that is the case, you will want to let your boss know
that it isn't so much DNS failing generally that is the majority of "DNS" Issues
with AD. It is poor and incorrect configuration of DNS or a poor
overall DNS architecture design for an environment that tends to be the
main DNS issue to hurt AD. If you have a proper DNS design, the DNS Servers are
properly configured, and you manage your environment well, DNS really shouldn't
be any more issue than say a properly configured and running WINS
Service[1].
Sort of along the lines of how Windows is so unsafe
and is easily compromised by viruses, spyware, etc only there are people
out there running it safely who have never had an issue with any of that.
[1] I sometimes I think this is a rare bird
though. However I have found a striking coincidence that many people who had
screwed up WINS setups have trouble getting DNS right as well. I think the
concept of name resolution is completely foreign to some people. Those are the
ones that say the server isn't responding and you say... Are you having an
issue resolving the name or is the server actually not responding to your
requests... And they look at you like you are from venus and say...
huh.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File I guess an effective and very visual test would be to ask
him if he feels safe with the HOST files and if he says yes, shut down all of
the DNS Services.
That will quickly end any debate I
think.
joe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan DeStefano Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 4:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Well, he said that he
wanted it on domain controllers so that if DNS goes down that people can still
log on. But that is not the case, right? People can logon to a DC in AD as long
as that DC can query a GC, right? From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Did you
ask him if you could have the host file on his machine… that he MUST be using to
browse the web with? DNS untrustworthy vs host file…
bahaha From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Recently, one of my colleagues and I
got into a discussion about DNS vs. hosts files in AD. He has configured the
hosts file on all of our domain controllers (Windows 2000 AD in native mode) to
point to other DCs. One of our DCs was moved to another site and the hosts file
on a DC was not changed to point to the moved DC on its new subnet – this
obviously resulted in NTFRS errors. Anyway, after this I got into a
discussion with my boss about the need of the hosts file in AD. It is my
position that the hosts file is no longer necessary and should not really be
used in AD and is only included for backward-compatibility, testing and for
certain special instances. It is his position that DNS is untrustworthy and that
the hosts file should be configured as a backup in case DNS goes down. My
response to this was twofold – 1. the hosts file is queried before DNS so it is
not really a backup, it is a primary method of name-resolution, plus, it does
not support Could anyone point to any
documentation that discusses the role of the hosts file in AD and also include
your own opinions and comments. _________________________ PC Support
Specialist IAG
Research T. F. Measuring Ad Effectiveness on
Television The information contained in this
communication is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the
exclusive use of the above named addressee(s). If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are expressly prohibited from copying, distributing,
disseminating, or in any other way using any of the information contained within
this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please
contact the sender by telephone |
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Medeiros, Jose
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File deji
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Jorge de Almeida Pinto
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Gil Kirkpatrick
- Re: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Kern, Tom
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Rick Kingslan
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Medeiros, Jose
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Jorge de Almeida Pinto
