I can't browse or access file shares. If i type a unc with an ip, i get "the 
network location could not be reached". 
Its my understanding that when you use an ip in a UNC, you are using NTLM and 
NOT kerberos.

When i run ethereal while trying the unc with ip combo, it looks as if the 
client is trying to connect on port 80 to the ip?!!
i thought it would be 445.

However, term services in app mode works fine over the vpn and i'm logging into 
the domain via the vpn client and the RRAS server.
i can ping DC's by name and ip.
all dns and wins settings are correct.

this is very very strange...
i wish i could figure this out. its gonna drive me to distraction.
thanks

Alex Fontana wrote:
> While vpn'd in can you browse/access file shares?  I remember having a
> similar issue and the fix being the following:
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;244474
> 
> -Alex
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 1:24 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Joining workstation to domain over vpn(again)
> 
> I have no idea but I doubt it because it does an ldap search on my
> dc's looking for its name and comes up null.
> 
> I'm not sure what to look for, i've never run a sniffer while joining
> a domain.
> I guess i'd expect some kerberos and smb...
> but i don't see that. just the ldap search(ethereal calls it "cldap")
> and dns queries.
> even if it were blocked, i should see an attempt on the client side to
> connect on these ports but i don't.
> and as i said, no firewall of any kind and all other clients at that
> location can join via vpn with no issues.
> thanks
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Does the LDAP ping imply that the client can't access port 389?
>> 
>>> m:dsm:cci:mvp
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
>> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:47 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Joining workstation to domain over
>> vpn(again) 
>> 
>> No.
>> There are about 5 other win xp clients in that office that have been
>> able to join the domain via VPN.
>> 
>> This is the only one with an issue and its not running any fw
>> software. 
>> 
>> Some of the other's are running xp sp2 with the firewall on and they
>> have no issues. 
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> Medeiros, Jose wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>> 
>>> Do you have Zone Alarm or some other type of Software Based
>>> Firewall installed? 
>>> 
>>> Jose
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kern, Tom
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:03 PM
>>> To: ActiveDir (E-mail)
>>> Subject: [ActiveDir] Joining workstation to domain over vpn(again)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm still having problems joining a winxp sp1 MS PPTP vpn client to
>>> my domain. The client is connecting to a windows 2000 sp4 RRAS
>>> server via pptp. When i try to join the domain, I get the prompt to
>>> enter creditianls and then, "network name could not be found" error.
>>> I have all correct dns/wins settings. I made an #PRE and #DOM  entry
>>> in lmhosts pointing to the PDCE.
>>> 
>>> When i run ethereal, i see the client querying and getting the srv
>>> records from my dns for all dc's in the domain and doing an ldap
>>> search on a number of dc's sucessfully.
>>> 
>>> Then the last thing i get is a failed ldap ping(port unreachable).
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure if that's the issue.
>>> 
>>> I'm not doing NAT or Port address transaltion for the RRAS server.
>>> It has a public ip. The only PAT/NAT is on the client side but I
>>> don't think that is really an issue as I can vpn and auth to AD
>>> thru the RRAS server and term service in app mode to other servers.
>>> I just can't join the domain. 
>>> 
>>> Any help would be great.
>>> thanks
>>> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>>> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>>> List archive:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>>> 
>>> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>>> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>>> List archive:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>> 
>> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>> List archive:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>> List archive:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info
> : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx 
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ 

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to