the object(its a global group) was never deleted. The whole global group ended up in the lost and Found container.
thanks Hunter, Laura E. wrote: > It'll also happen if a container object gets deleted in the same > replication cycle that someone creates an object -within- that > container. So you delete the "Foo" OU in the same cycle that someone > else creates user "JSmith" inside of Foo, and JSmith lands in Lost & > Found. > > - Laura > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kern, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 4:23 PM >> To: ActiveDir (E-mail) >> Subject: [ActiveDir] Lost and found >> >> Why would something end up in the Lost and found container in the >> domain NC? I haven't used movetree or any migration utlity. >> >> Is there any other reason why something would end up there and >> become orphaned? thanks >> >> List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx >> List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx >> List archive: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >> >> > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
