2K DCs involved would be my guess ... or possibly they auth. restored it! -- Dean Wells MSEtechnology * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msetechnology.com
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 4:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Lost and found OK. We now have the Dean and joe version of what is happening. I'm good with it. So, why is Tom's LastKnownParent blank? Now I'm interested..... Rick -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 9:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Lost and found Dean is correct, just tested it out on K3. When an object gets tossed into lost and found the lastKnownParent gets populated as well as when an object is deleted it gets populated. joe -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 9:52 PM To: Send - AD mailing list Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Lost and found Joe's - lastKnownParent populated only during (group) object's-parent-deletion coinciding with (group) object's-move into deleted (& same) parent ... operations originated against individual DCs. Dean's - lastKnownParent also populated during 2K3 DC's decision (when resolving conflict) to move (group) object into LostAndFound container due to absent parent ... lastKnownParent was populated as a result of conflict-resolution's 'move to LostAndFound' operation. -- Dean Wells MSEtechnology * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msetechnology.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunter, Laura E. Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 9:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Lost and found Hmmmm, this last bit just piqued my interest: [joe] I think lastKnownParent is only available on objects deleted on a K3 DC. I.E. If an object hasn't been deleted and if that deletion didn't occur on a K3 DC, it wouldn't be populated. [Dean] Not quite, your statement is true ... but only to a point. Assuming the origin of the move operation was a 2K3 DC, the lastKnownParent will indeed be populated ... the attribute serves a greater purpose than most documentation will elude to. *stares* Okay, what's the difference between what the two of you just said? It would appear that there's a subtlety I'm missing, since it reads the same to me. - Laura List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
