They can access it, they have problem only when it goes offline.

On 7/5/05, TIROA YANN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Have u checked your dns configuration ? Such as SRV records available for 
> your second GC in the format _ldap._tcp.gc._msdcs.<DnsForestName> ? Maybe, 
> your clients can not find the second GC dû to a lack or pb with dns records 
> (A,SRV,etc..).
> Check if u use Ipsec/Firewall that could prevent your clients to acces your 
> GC.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Yann
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de rubix cube
> Envoyé : mardi 5 juillet 2005 10:51
> À : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: [ActiveDir] GC
> 
> One site and all servers in that one site.
> 
> 
> On 7/5/05, Rops, Arjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How many sites do you have configured in your AD?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rubix cube
> > Sent: dinsdag 5 juli 2005 10:34
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GC
> >
> > Suffering = users loose connectivity to their mailbox (the Outlook
> > shows a message saying Trying to connect to your exchange server),
> > users can't use their home directories on the servers, users not being
> > able to print, basically users goes offline, waiting for the GC to be
> > online, now this I understand if there was only one GC, but if 2, then
> > this shouldn't happen,
> >
> > i.e. the network appears to be seeing each GC as the only one.
> >
> > Is there anything else other than checking the Global Catalogue check
> > box to make a server GC? (and add it in the system manager in the
> > exchange server as a GC too) ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > r.c.
> >
> > On 7/5/05, Ruston, Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't agree with the below at all, to be candid. I would rather
> > > have
> > 7 servers, knowing I can lose 1 or 2 without issue, rather than
> > working round the clock to keep 2 servers up all the time. To me,
> > that's the beauty of systems like AD, where the system is distributed
> > and self resilient. You however, have removed some of that resilience
> > from the system and have thus moved the maintenance effort from the
> > system onto your own lap.
> > >
> > > Anyway, now that's off my chest - I think you need to explain what
> > 'the network suffers' means. What symptoms do you see when a GC goes
> > offline? I'd also like to know why your GCs are going offline.
> > >
> > > We have 100+ GCs here and we probably have 4-5 issues per year. When
> > we do have an issue, the net effect on the end user is negligible due
> > to the self healing and resilient nature of AD/GCs themselves.
> > >
> > > neil
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rubix cube
> > > Sent: 05 July 2005 08:48
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GC
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for teh reply :)
> > >
> > > I will tell you, because now I have to maintain 2 servers (the GCs)
> > online 24/7 I can't take one offline for maitenance for a second cause
> > the network goes down, imagine if I upgrade the other 5, then I will
> > have to keep 7 servers alive 24/7!!!!!!!
> > >
> > > I configure the exchange to use multiple GC, but why the network
> > suffers if one of them goes offline? I dont' know? is it by design? or
> > am I missing something
> > >
> > > thaks,
> > > r.c.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/5/05, Ruston, Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > "rough and ready" response :)
> > > >
> > > > 1. Client logons, Exchange GAL lookups and various other
> > > > components require a GC to be available, ideally in the same site.
> > > > 2. Why are only 2 of the 7 DCs also GCs?
> > > >
> > > > Given that you are experiencing issues, I'd be inclined to 'upgrade'
> > > > the remaining 5 DCs to GC status and ensure that your Exchange
> > servers
> > > > are configured to use multiple GCs.
> > > >
> > > > When all DCs are GCs, the infra master FSMO becomes redundant too,
> > so
> > > > that's one less FSMO to worry about catering for :)
> > > >
> > > > neil
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rubix
> > > > cube
> > > > Sent: 05 July 2005 08:16
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: [ActiveDir] GC
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I have 2 GC and 7 domain controllers, I made 2 GC so that if I had
> > to
> > > > take any one of them offline the other will be functional and the
> > > > network will be ok, what happens is that if any of them goes
> > offline,
> > > > the network goes down, (includeing email service exchange). Any
> > thing
> > > > I should have done ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > r.c.
> > > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > > > List archive:
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > >
> > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > ========
> > > > Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> > communications disclaimer:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml
> > > >
> > > >
> > ======================================================================
> > > > ========
> > > >
> > > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > > > List archive:
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > >
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > > List archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > >
> > >
> > ======================================================================
> > ==
> > ======
> > > Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> > communications disclaimer:
> > >
> > > http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml
> > >
> > >
> > ======================================================================
> > ==
> > ======
> > >
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > > List archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > >
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> >
> >
> > This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended 
> > recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential 
> > information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, 
> > disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an 
> > intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any 
> > attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> >
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to