RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Enterasys vs Cisco

[Brian Desmond]

I think the statement of config commands being easier is pretty relative. Personally I find IOS to be quite intuitive and I could likely punch out a basic class map for you here even not doing it often based on the amount of time I spend on IOS based devices…   Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED]   c - 312.731.3132     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Harris Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 6:49 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Enterasys vs Cisco   I've got a bunch of their Matrix C2 switches, and they're working pretty well.  The config commands are easier than Cisco to achieve comparable settings, and the default QOS settings work perfectly with our VOIP.  I plan to add more of them next year; they're a good value for the money.   HTH Derek   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 12:17 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Enterasys vs Cisco Hi –   Has anyone had good or bad experiences with Enterasys networking equipment? We are planning to go with Cisco, but some Enterasys sales folks promise twice the performance at half the price. (ok, maybe not quite that good but….)   Any thoughts?   Thanks.   -- nme   -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/176 - Release Date: 11/20/2005