|
I certainly have found the AM interface a
lot less overwhelming and pleasant to work with as opposed to MOM although MOM
2005 SP1 is a vast improvement. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick Hmm.. Plenty of good ideas, but I have to admit if you find MOM
difficult and don't want to spend the time, most of the solutions talked about
will have similar issues. I admit MOM interface is terrible for what you
sound like you want to do. Then again, can it be simpler (the answer's
yes, but that's another discussion.) The benefit of MOM is that it comes out of the box configured with
plenty of thresholds already configured from the vendor that made your
directory service. If you go looking for another product, ensure that the
product you look at does the same. If they don't you'll spend oodles of
time configuring and tweaking the product. In fact, I've seen implementations
that finish tweaking just in time for the next upgrade cycle ;) -ajm On 1/5/06, Al
Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: OpenNMS – Replaced a Nagios box. See the website www.opennms.org -----Original Message----- Hi all Just looking for some advice on server monitoring
tools, and for DC monitoring as well as exchange monitoring I'm currently using Argent but found it much of a
hassle to setup and the predefined rules out of the box is very standard and is
much more expensive than others as well. Tried installing MOM but the gui isnt easy (havent
have time to play around much)... Any suggestions or experience on good monitoring
products - preferred agentless.. Thank you and have a splendid day! Kind Regards, Freddy Hartono |
- RE: [ActiveDir] Way OT: DC & Server monitoring tools Peter Johnson
