Hm - you're right - don't write tired and exhausted. Seize it and clean the old one out of AD.
Gruesse - Sincerely, Ulf B. Simon-Weidner MVP-Book "Windows XP - Die Expertentipps": http://tinyurl.com/44zcz Weblog: http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner Website: http://www.windowsserverfaq.org Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F2F1214C811 D |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Onyszko |Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:50 PM |To: [email protected] |Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Schema Extension | |Ulf B. Simon-Weidner wrote: | |> Hi David, |> |> OK - as far as controlling the update of the schema I'd do |it that way: |> |> Do you really care - aka not frequently tested combination of schema |> extensions: |> 1. Put the schema master on a otherwise stale switch/hub (to |provide a |> link but no connection to the network) 2. Backup Systemstate |(to file |> would be fine) 3. Run the Schema Extensions 4. Verify Schema |> Extensions 5. If error in 4, restore systemstate 6. Plug |back into the |> production network | |Ulf ... I don't think that restoring the system state in the |case of schema extension failure is a proper thing. I would |suggest instead of that decommission of this DC and seizing |Schema FSMO to other DC in the forest. | | |-- |Tomasz Onyszko |http://www.w2k.pl/blog/ - (PL) |http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/ - (EN) |List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx |List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx |List archive: |http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
