Hi Aric,
    No, there were a lot more errors - all seem to be related to SFU
attributes.  I only copied a small portion to my posting to save
bandwidth.  Painful = time = headaches  8-(  I was expecting this
upgrade to be a "walk in the park".

Mike Thommes

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion?

Are these the only two errors you received?

I encountered similar errors during beta testing when I implemented R2
in an existing forest - but a lot more than just 2. :)  I created a
secondary forest and validated that it did not recur.  Note that I also
had SFU installed in the original forest and the new secondary forest.

I was able to clean up the schema in the existing forest exhibiting the
errors but it was a fairly painful process of what seemed to be a goose
chase.  The tasks included disabling objects attributes in the schema
and renaming them amongst other things.

Fortunately I have not heard of this happening in production...yet.

So can these errors be ignored?  If I remember correctly ADPrep is
actually failing and therefore NO you cannot ignore these errors since
ADPREP will nto occur until they are resolved.

Regards,

Aric

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes,
Michael M.
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] issue with R2 upgrade; SFU confusion?

Hi,
    We did a adprep /forestprep from the W2K3/SP1 R2 Disk 2 CD today on
our testbed FSMO DC.  It gave the following errors (only a portion shown
below) because, I am guessing, that we had already installed SFU 3.5 on
this forest some time ago.  Should I assume these errors can be ignored?
Has anybody else experienced this?  Thanks as always!

Mike Thommes

====================================================================

"attributeId" attribute value for objects defined in Windows 2000 schema
and ext
ended schema do not match.


A previous schema extension has defined the attribute value as
"1.2.840.113556.1
.4.7000.187.70" for object
"CN=uidNumber,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=anl,DC=go
v" differently than the schema extension needed for Windows 2003 server
.
[Status/Consequence]
Adprep cannot extend your existing schema
[User Action]
Contact the vendor of the application that previously extended the
schema to res
olve the inconsistency. Then run adprep again.




========================================================================
=====
"attributeId" attribute value for objects defined in Windows 2000 schema
and ext
ended schema do not match.


A previous schema extension has defined the attribute value as
"1.2.840.113556.1
.4.7000.187.71" for object
"CN=gidNumber,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=anl,DC=go
v" differently than the schema extension needed for Windows 2003 server
.
[Status/Consequence]
Adprep cannot extend your existing schema
[User Action]
Contact the vendor of the application that previously extended the
schema to res
olve the inconsistency. Then run adprep again.


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to