I'm clear now...

Yeah, our infrastructure is very tiny compared to what you were
referencing. I believe a little tweaking the registry will at least
allow us to share the load a little better.

As for Joe.....we actually are AD Integrated DNS and have been since
win2k came out. I don't have any wood handy but I have plenty of Formica
around me just in case. If There were an environment that Microsoft was
built for it is ours. Most of the problems that come up on this list are
directed at much larger environments for which I am thankful for. I get
a lot of good info from the list and am thankful that you guys take time
out of you're day to answer our questions. 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or NOT

SO you are concerned about overall load then. This is something that is
addressed in larger orgs often by segregating the PDC off in its own
logical site which is hung off the main site it would normally be part
of. That means it will usually not be used for autocoverage of other WAN
sites and it will not become a large site bridgehead[1] and naturally
avoided by any Exchange in that site if Exchange for some reason decides
to beat on it due to some bad decision by an Exchange admin during
configuration. This is especially helpful if you have a large legacy
client load or lots of stupid applications that are using the old NET
API (or WinNT provider) primarily which already overly target PDCs.

   joe


[1] I recall asking way back at the 2003 RAP/RDP conference for a switch
to say use all DCs but these special ones for bridgeheads, I would
rather manage exceptions than manage the ones that are the ones to be
used. Best is to be able to specify either way.


--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlos
Magalhaes
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS on a DC or NOT

Let me put that into perspective (and from reading the post again I
thought it came across), the blog entry refers to networks with a large
client load.
I don't mean do NOT have DNS on your server it recommends (Option 2)
releasing some of the load with the two registry settings, i.e.
*LdapSrvPriority *and *LdapSrvWeight*.which is explained in the entry :)

These settings I have only ever used on large networks when I have
noticed a large amount of DNS traffic being routed to the PDC DNS
Service. :)

Does that explain the post if not just let me know what more information
you need and I will explain it :)

Carlos Magalhaes

ASB wrote:
> Which blog entry...
>  
> -ASB
>
>  
> On 5/17/06, *Krenceski, William* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     I was reading Carlos's blog about not running DNS on the PDC
>     emulator. It all makes perfect sense to not have DNS running on
>     it. In my relatively small setup we have @60 servers, 560pc's, on
>     8 networks (some remote some vlans). I have 2 DC's at my main site
>     with one at each remote site. All DC's are GC and DNS. I always
>     thought that in order for DNS to work as AD integrated you're DNS
>     servers had to be DC's. If that is NOT true my face is red for
>     believing so for so long.  
>      
>      
>      
>     **
>     **
>     *William Krenceski*
>     *Network Administrator*
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may be 
legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of 
the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any release, dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this communication in error please notify the author immediately 
by replying to this message and deleting the original message. Thank you.

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to