because you want something to work if no domain is available, perhaps
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Abouelnasr, Jerry
Sent: Thu 18/05/2006 21:16
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
What’s a reason for using a local group or account on a file server?
_____
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Wade
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
I said "may" not "typically". There are reasons for using local
accounts (or groups)...
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 18/05/2006 19:29
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
>>>....but then you may have issues with the permissions on the
second drive
if you get a different SID on the re-build....
On a file server? Do you typically use local file server
accounts for your
permissioning?
Sincerely,
_____
(, / | /) /) /)
/---| (/_ ______ ___// _ // _
) / |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/ /)
(/
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com <http://www.readymaids.com> - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com <http://www.akomolafe.com>
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried
about
Yesterday? -anon
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dave Wade
Sent: Thu 5/18/2006 11:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
These days I am much more curious as to the benifits of RAID5?
It slows the
I/O down. It can really crawl if you loose a drive and the
server has to
rebuild the missing volume?
As for multiple partitions, I can't actually see any real
advantage on a file
server. You can easily move the files to any drive and just
re-share the
folders. I guess it does make for an easier wipe and build, but
then you may
have issues with the permissions on the second drive if you get
a different
SID on the re-build.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Timothy Foster
Sent: Thu 18/05/2006 18:28
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
Thanks, Brian. That makes sense.
So if I have a 4 disk array on a single backplane, and
given that I
want the benefits of RAID 5, is there any argument for
configuring more than
one partition on the array? I realize that this is potentially
too much of
an open-ended question, but I'm curious :-). The basic premise
is that this
server would be a workhorse domain member/file server. Would
one partition -
C: - combined with carefully configured share and NTFS
permissions provide
adequate security? Or is it better to put the OS on C: and the
shares on D: ?
Or does the benefit of partitions lie somewhere else - for
example, if I
wanted to wipe C: and reinstall the OS without touching D: ?
(I'm not sure
if I like this idea, but as I mentioned, I'm curious...).
Thanks,
Tim
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
Tim-
It doesn't really matter. The RAID controller has no
idea about the
partition table. It just presents a LUN to the OS and the OS
writes to it.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
c - 312.731.3132
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Foster
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
Using a RAID controller's configuration utility I can
build and
initialize a RAID 5 container. When installing the OS, I can,
if I choose,
create a partition. Is this a good or bad idea? In other
words, if I
partition RAID 5 container during the OS install will it make
any difference
if I ever need to replace a drive and rebuild the array? Will
the partition
table be recognized during the rebuild?
Thanks for your input.
Tim
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they
are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to
disclose this
email, or any response to it, under the Freedom of Information
Act 2000,
unless the information in it is covered by one of the
exemptions in the Act.
If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport
e-Services via
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and then permanently remove it from your
system.
Thank you.
http://www.stockport.gov.uk
**********************************************************************
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
<<winmail.dat>>
