Can yo please narrow that down a bit?
In terms of security?
In terms of features?
Exchange 2000 you have internal IM built in.. Exchange 2003 you don't
and have to purchase LCS.
Exchange 2000 has had some pretty nasty security bugs that didn't
require authentication to exploit.... Exchange 2003's only real nasty
one that made me jump up and down to get SBSers to patch is the recent
iCal vulnerability.
Better recovery story in the 2003 era than 2000 era is another strong
advantage in my book.
Outlook over http.. hands down right there is a huge advantage.
Exchange 2003 sp2 mobility story.. remote wipe.. Window Mobile is really
starting to kick butt over Blackberry.. the Treos are Blackberry
killer.. and for standard Exchange boxes.. the fact that in the Exchange
2003 sp2 era we have 75 gigs of storage wheras before we had 16 gig max
(and no snickering from the terrabyte folks.. I can hear you over there)
means we don't have "Standard" firms buying the Exchange Enterprise as
much anymore as they were hitting that 16 gig ceiling.
.. and I just barely scratched the surface IMHO....
Ajay Kumar wrote:
Hi all,
Can any one pls tell me what's deffernet between Exchange 2000 and 2003.
Regards,
Ajay.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
