|
I think the codes like 42c converted to
decimal will give you the process id and them the thread is the 2nd code, 2f0.
If that helps any.
I think this is not always a problem.
1) Take a look at AV on the workstations. I have seen AV
patches on the clients that drive CPU up on the DC for dfssvc.exe. Take a look
at AV on the DC.
2) How are these DCs performing. CPU busy?, what happens if
you stop netlogon?. Some infected PCs one time were causing a DOS on the DCs.
You may want to take a look at enabling Netlogon tracing and using a tool
called NLPARSE to check the results. Look at the .CSV file for pages of failed
codes from specific clients. Go take a look at these
clients.
Article about enabling NL logs:
2080ffff
3) move a workstation to an OU without GPOs and see what
happens. If there is a GPO problem, start applying the existing GPO to the new
OU one by one. Things like folder redirection and the location of the user's
profile could be an issue.
4) make that call to PSS
Good luck From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clay, Justin (ITS) Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 10:52 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] PCs hang at "Applying computer settings" after upgradingDCs to 2K3 SP1 Hopefully the attachment comes through. The interesting part, and where most of the time delay is seen is here:
USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:36:47:528 ProcessGPOs: Machine role is 2. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:37:50:606 MyGetUserName: GetUserNameEx failed with 1753. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:37:50:606 MyGetUserName: Retrying call to GetUserNameEx in 1/2 second. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:38:54:371 MyGetUserName: GetUserNameEx failed with 1753. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:38:54:371 MyGetUserName: Retrying call to GetUserNameEx in 1/2 second. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:39:58:027 MyGetUserName: GetUserNameEx failed with 1753. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:39:58:027 MyGetUserName: Retrying call to GetUserNameEx in 1/2 second. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:41:01:573 MyGetUserName: GetUserNameEx failed with 1753. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:41:01:573 ProcessGPOs: MyGetUserName failed with 1753. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:41:01:573 ProcessGPOs: No WMI logging done in this policy cycle. USERENV(42c.2f0) 12:41:01:573 ProcessGPOs: Processing failed with error 1753.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Al
Mulnick
I think a different thread mentioned that DNS was about 90% of the cause of this type of behavior. It's not the only one however.
What keeps rebooting? The DC? Or the workstations?
If the workstations, not only ethereal but Darren's suggestion of logging is a
good idea. On 6/2/06, Za Vue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Finally..someone is also experiencing this problem. My
DCs are Windows 2003 SP1 also. It seems to hang every 3-4 reboots. My first
thought was DNS DNS.. but NetDiag, Repl, DCDiag, Nslookup all show no error.
Nothing is reported in logs. It is not firewall. I have play with NetBIOS,
changing Provider Order in Network Neighborhood->Advanced Settings..nada.
Hello,
Last night we upgraded our 3 Win2K3 domain controllers to SP1. This morning, we're getting tons and tons of calls from users who report that their computer sits at "Applying computer settings" for a good 10 minutes, then another 10 or so minutes at "Applying your personalized settings"
After the upgrade we did start seeing DCOM errors in the System event log, which I've found many people online have experienced. I "fixed it" (or at least the DCOM errors went away) by granting Network Service the following rights:
Local Launch Remote Launch Local Activation Remote Activation
In the Launch and Activation Permissions dialog on the Security tab of the netman component. However, even after the DCOM errors have gone away, we continue to see the same results on the clients.
Any ideas? I'm considering calling Premier Support, but I figured you guys would be better help than them.
Thanks,
Justin
Clay
|
- RE: [ActiveDir] PCs hang at... Thommes, Michael M.
- Re: [ActiveDir] PCs ha... Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
- RE: [ActiveDir] PCs ha... deji
- RE: [ActiveDir] PCs ha... Figueroa, Johnny
- Re: [ActiveDir] PCs ha... Al Mulnick
- Re: [ActiveDir] PC... Za Vue
- RE: [ActiveDir] PCs ha... Darren Mar-Elia
- RE: [ActiveDir] PCs ha... Clay, Justin \(ITS\)
- RE: [ActiveDir] PCs ha... Richard Kline
- RE: [ActiveDir] PCs ha... Clay, Justin \(ITS\)
- RE: [ActiveDir] PCs ha... Clay, Justin \(ITS\)
- RE: [ActiveDir] PC... Darren Mar-Elia
- Re: [ActiveDir] PC... Al Mulnick
