And in a small network with SBS we want the DHCP on our DC because the
AD/DNS works WAY better than when the DHCP is on the router.  We
strongly recommend that the DHCP stays on the server.

These days most IT pros remotely manage that SBS box and some don't even
delegate to an onsite IT person (of which there is none anyway).

What's the risks of this location.. what risks does it introduce elsewhere.. best practices for you guys in big server land aren't necessarily best practices for a small business...just keep that in mind.

We're little... so sometimes those "bad things for security" don't mean
as much when we're blasting through so many other 'don'ts' of
computing.... just keep that in mind.

Susan

Phil Renouf wrote:

It's not a best practice, but if you are a small shop and you will be maintaining all of the acl's and permissions then it's not so bad. If you have to delegate that to someone who isnt a domain admin then you're pretty much out of luck since you need to grant them pretty serious rights to be able to log onto the DC and perform that duty. Also, running DHCP on a DC is a bad thing for security: http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/d0e19b57-c368-46c2-b017-caf25ae150ec1033.mspx?mfr=true <http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/Library/d0e19b57-c368-46c2-b017-caf25ae150ec1033.mspx?mfr=true> See the "Securing records when using the DnsUpdateProxy group" section. Phil

On 6/28/06, *Larry Wahlers* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    On a lesser note, is there any problem with having a DC also be their
    file server and print server? Again, we're only talking 20 people
    here.
    Assuming I can at least get the server rack locked, and I put the file
    shares on a separate partition (i.e., not on the C drive, of course).

    This is all good. I think I have enough ammunition to, at least,
    cover
    myself if management decides to go ahead and put a DC in that
    location.
    The reason is, of course, this group of 20 folks have no money, so
    we'll
    have to buy them a server out of our own budget, because they are
    one of
    our supported clients and we have no choice. In my opinion,
    however, we
    *do* have a choice as to whether we allow a DC to be in a physically
    non-secure location.

    --
    Larry Wahlers
    Concordia Technologies
    The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    direct office line: (314) 996-1876

    List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
    List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
    List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
    <http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx>



--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com

If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will hunt you down...
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to