http://support.microsoft.com/kb/898060

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Falde
> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 5:19 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] R2 In-Place Upgrade bug ?
> 
> I would definitely get the tcpip.sys hotfixes applied as this 
> sounds very symptomatic of ms05-019 issues.
> 
> Kurt Falde
> Sent from my Windows Mobile Phone
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "HBooGz"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 7/29/06 10:58:58 AM
> To: "ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org"<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] R2 In-Place Upgrade bug ?
> 
> I applied no post sp-1 fixes, but i would imagine it's worth a try.
> 
> do you guys want to hear something even more mind-boggling ?
> 
> i can ping the server from workstations outside the main office!!!
> 
> i've remotely connected to workstations at our IPSEC vpns to 
> test login times and email access,a nd pinged the problematic 
> server just fine!!!
> 
> arghhh
> 
> Matheesha:
> 
> Incoming connections i mean services that somehow are not 
> defined to the server. I run a repadmin /replsum from another 
> dc and it shows no errors. i run a dcdiag /s:problemserver 
> with no problem. so it means that directory service traffic 
> is allowed, but when i try to Dameware ( tcp port 6129) to 
> the machine it times out, when i try to the ping the box i 
> get nothing from the main office!
> 
> i checked the IPSEC domain and Standard profile and made sure 
> no IPSEC polocies were applied.
> 
> if it's the SCW -- how do i look at it ?
> 
> could it someway be my checkpoint firewall at the local site 
> ? how in the world can it accept icmp from other workstations 
> ( win2k pro) at my remote vpn sites ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/29/06, Kurt Falde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  Did you apply the post SP1 security hotfixes? I know there are a 
> > couple of updates for tcpip.sys which fix issues which will 
> cause AD 
> > repl issues from a couple times in the field. Check out 
> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/898060 or for the latest tcpip.sys 
> > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS06-007.mspx .
> >
> >
> >
> > *Kurt Falde*
> >   ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *HBooGz
> > *Sent:* Saturday, July 29, 2006 5:39 AM
> > *To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> > *Subject:* [ActiveDir] R2 In-Place Upgrade bug ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Morning to all -
> >
> > I just spent the last 6 hours with dell gold software support team 
> > trying to figure out the following occurrence:
> >
> > The upgraded R2 DC does not accept incoming connections, but it 
> > appears it accepts certain connections. Particularly those 
> related to 
> > directory services. e.g. telnet *server ip* 389 from the 
> mail server 
> > works. \\*serverip or servername *brings up the shared 
> printers and folders perfectly.
> >
> > outbound traffic and icmp works fine, inbound icmp returns 
> a time out.
> >
> > scenario:
> >
> > Windows 2000 SP4 DC in-place upgrade to windows 2003 SP1 
> then upgrade 
> > to R2.
> > connections to and from box were fine on 2003 sp1.
> > downgraded NIC drivers to match other r2 DC on identical server 
> > hardware/model installed new nic drivers and proset upgraded to R2.
> > rebooted and noticed a ton of errors with services hanging 
> upon boot.
> > checked connection to the box from workstations and 
> servers, but all 
> > requests timed out.
> > i made sure ICF was disabled.
> > i disabled IPSEC and entered dword value for ProhibitIpSec 
> - nothing i 
> > then enabled ICF configured exceptions - explicitly 
> allowing ICMP, and 
> > still nothing.
> > reset the TCP/ip stack and winsock using netsh, nothing servers has 
> > two nics, one of which is disabled. changed binding order 
> so active is 
> > on top -- nothing reinstalled the binaries of windows 2003 sp1 and 
> > upgraded to r2 again -- nothing.
> >
> > i'm at a lost of ideas and sure could use to vast resources the 
> > contributors of this group may have or know of.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > HBooGz:\>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> HBooGz:\>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to