Thank you.

So it looks like i should get the hotfix related to this article:

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/898060 but it says in that article that the download supplied is superceeded by the hotfix i applied already : Security update 913446 (security bulletin MS06-007) supersedes this update (898060).

so which hotfixes do i really need ?

what's the mystery is why can the clients and servers outside the subnet connecting via VPN ping this server by name and IP succesfully.



On 7/29/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The trick here is go to the bulletin and check the caveats section
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS05-019.mspx

Which links to....
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/893066

Which points to...

Network connectivity between clients and servers may not work after you
install security update MS05-019. For more information, click the
following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge
Base:
898060 </kb/898060/> ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/898060/)
Installing security update MS05-019 or Windows Server 2003 Service Pack
1 may cause network connectivity between clients and servers to fail
•       For more information, click the following article number to view the
article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
898542 </kb/898542/> (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/898542/) Windows
Server 2003 systems using IPsec tunnel-mode functionality may experience
problems after you install the original version of 893066



HBooGz wrote:
> I applied the related to article ending with MS06-007.mspx
> < http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS06-007.mspx> .
>
> do you happen to have the hotfix for the other article ?
>
>
>
> On 7/29/06, *Kurt Falde* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     I would definitely get the tcpip.sys hotfixes applied as this
>     sounds very symptomatic of ms05-019 issues.
>
>     Kurt Falde
>     Sent from my Windows Mobile Phone
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: "HBooGz"<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>     Sent: 7/29/06 10:58:58 AM
>     To: " [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>"<[email protected]
>     <mailto: [email protected]>>
>     Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] R2 In-Place Upgrade bug ?
>
>     I applied no post sp-1 fixes, but i would imagine it's worth a try.
>
>     do you guys want to hear something even more mind-boggling ?
>
>     i can ping the server from workstations outside the main office!!!
>
>     i've remotely connected to workstations at our IPSEC vpns to test
>     login
>     times and email access,a nd pinged the problematic server just fine!!!
>
>     arghhh
>
>     Matheesha:
>
>     Incoming connections i mean services that somehow are not defined
>     to the
>     server. I run a repadmin /replsum from another dc and it shows no
>     errors. i
>     run a dcdiag /s:problemserver with no problem. so it means that
>     directory
>     service traffic is allowed, but when i try to Dameware ( tcp port
>     6129) to
>     the machine it times out, when i try to the ping the box i get
>     nothing from
>     the main office!
>
>     i checked the IPSEC domain and Standard profile and made sure no IPSEC
>     polocies were applied.
>
>     if it's the SCW -- how do i look at it ?
>
>     could it someway be my checkpoint firewall at the local site ? how
>     in the
>     world can it accept icmp from other workstations ( win2k pro) at
>     my remote
>     vpn sites ?
>
>
>
>
>
>     On 7/29/06, Kurt Falde < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>     >
>     >  Did you apply the post SP1 security hotfixes? I know there are
>     a couple
>     > of updates for tcpip.sys which fix issues which will cause AD
>     repl issues
>     > from a couple times in the field. Check out
>     > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/898060 or for the latest tcpip.sys
>     > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS06-007.mspx .
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > *Kurt Falde*
>     >   ------------------------------
>     >
>     > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:
>     > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>] *On Behalf Of *HBooGz
>     > *Sent:* Saturday, July 29, 2006 5:39 AM
>     > *To:* [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > *Subject:* [ActiveDir] R2 In-Place Upgrade bug ?
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Morning to all -
>     >
>     > I just spent the last 6 hours with dell gold software support
>     team trying
>     > to figure out the following occurrence:
>     >
>     > The upgraded R2 DC does not accept incoming connections, but it
>     appears it
>     > accepts certain connections. Particularly those related to directory
>     > services. e.g . telnet *server ip* 389 from the mail server
>     works. \\*serverip
>     > or servername *brings up the shared printers and folders perfectly.
>     >
>     > outbound traffic and icmp works fine, inbound icmp returns a
>     time out.
>     >
>     > scenario:
>     >
>     > Windows 2000 SP4 DC in-place upgrade to windows 2003 SP1 then
>     upgrade to
>     > R2.
>     > connections to and from box were fine on 2003 sp1.
>     > downgraded NIC drivers to match other r2 DC on identical server
>     > hardware/model
>     > installed new nic drivers and proset
>     > upgraded to R2.
>     > rebooted and noticed a ton of errors with services hanging upon
>     boot.
>     > checked connection to the box from workstations and servers, but
>     all
>     > requests timed out.
>     > i made sure ICF was disabled.
>     > i disabled IPSEC and entered dword value for ProhibitIpSec - nothing
>     > i then enabled ICF configured exceptions - explicitly allowing
>     ICMP, and
>     > still nothing.
>     > reset the TCP/ip stack and winsock using netsh, nothing
>     > servers has two nics, one of which is disabled. changed binding
>     order so
>     > active is on top -- nothing
>     > reinstalled the binaries of windows 2003 sp1 and upgraded to r2
>     again --
>     > nothing.
>     >
>     > i'm at a lost of ideas and sure could use to vast resources the
>     > contributors of this group may have or know of.
>     >
>     > Thanks,
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > HBooGz:\>
>     >
>
>
>
>     --
>     HBooGz:\>
>     List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>     List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>     List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
>
>
>
>
> --
> HBooGz:\>
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx



--
HBooGz:\>

Reply via email to