What are people's views on whether to enable or disable hyper-threading on a Proliant box running Windows 2003 as a DC. I remember Intel advised HT to be disabled on Windows 2000 but has this changed for Windows 2003?. Are the performance benefits significant for a DC?ThanksDavid****************************************************************************
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual or entity named. If you are not the named addressee
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not
accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
This message is provided for informational purposes and should not
be construed as an invitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
GAM operates in many jurisdictions and is
regulated or licensed in those jurisdictions as required.
****************************************************************************
I've always viewed HT as that "in-between" technology while dual core chips were being developed for the x86 platform and until 64b could come of age.
The thinking generally was always back and forth between use it and disable it for various Microsoft server applications. It was discouraged for W2K by intel, but encourarged by some at Microsoft. Supposed to have been much improved in W2K3 (it shows properly now in taskmgr if that helps :) Confusing to say the least.
I've used it without issue. I haven't really noticed a boost in perfromance either though.
My thoughts: When it doubt, disable it. The goal here is the reliability and stability of the application (Active Directory in this case) and if performance is a problem you have other options such as 64b and dual-core solutions.
IIRC, HT is still discouraged if using Virtual Server but double check if you plan to use it that way. Something in the readme as I recall that gives more information.
Al
On 8/7/06, Wyatt, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Re: [ActiveDir] DCs & Hyper-Threading Al Mulnick
- Re: [ActiveDir] DCs & Hyper-Threading AFidel
- Re: [ActiveDir] DCs & Hyper-Threading Paul Williams
