RE: [ActiveDir] FMSO roles split, patch question.

[John Strongosky]

06-040?? What is this?   john From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:17 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] FMSO roles split, patch question. The main thing it to test and approve 06-040 and get that one on the fast track IMHO. Deji Akomolafe wrote: It doesn't matter.   Sincerely,    _____                                  (, /  |  /)               /)     /)       /---| (/_  ______   ___// _   //  _  ) /    |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_ (_/                             /)                                     (/       Microsoft MVP - Directory Services www.akomolafe.com - we know IT -5.75, -3.23 Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon From: John Strongosky Sent: Tue 8/8/2006 4:49 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] FMSO roles split, patch question. We have our FMSO roles split between 2 dc's. They are Schema Master/Domain Tree Operator on 1 and on 2,  the roles PDC Emulator/Rid Pool/Intrastate on the other. After I apply the patches from Microsoft what is the beat practices for the boot order...or does it matter?   1. Remote DC/GC's first 2. no. 1 3. then no 2.     thanks       -- Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will hunt you down... http://blogs.technet.com/sbs List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx